I have a pair of RF IC's, wired with capacitors and coils as suggested by the manufacturer, on a prototype vero-board. (see pictures). These are an OOK 433MHz transmiter CMT2150 and a receiver CMT2250 by the chineese rf manufacturer COMSTEK. I made them working but at less than 3 meters distance. Should I proceed with pcb prototyping/manufacturing hoping that the properly made pcb will improve the range to 20 meters (line of sight) which is the requirement ? Should I try external LNA ? transmitter top transmitter bottom

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Until you understand the reason for the performance you're getting, there's no good reason to expect the PCB will have better performance. \$\endgroup\$
    – user16324
    Feb 20, 2017 at 21:12
  • \$\begingroup\$ 3 meters for a 433MHz transmitter is very bad. What's the output power? \$\endgroup\$
    – Lundin
    Feb 22, 2017 at 7:43
  • \$\begingroup\$ CMT2150AW +13dBm \$\endgroup\$
    – TBELO
    Feb 23, 2017 at 9:27
  • \$\begingroup\$ That's very awful then. You should have hundreds of meters with proper radio design. \$\endgroup\$
    – Lundin
    Feb 23, 2017 at 12:54

1 Answer 1


I would have skipped the breadboard in the first place. At these frequencies, it is hard to predict what differences there might be between such a breadboard and a real PCB with proper layout and routing.

That said, the main difference in range will be the antenna. If the antenna is not self-contained, then the ground plane also matters a lot, since it's really a integral part of the antenna system. For a self-contained antenna, like a center-fed dipole for example, there is no issue of ground plane and you want the lump of conductor that is the circuit to be as small as possible.

Your antenna looks like it probably requires a ground plane.

3 meters is quite short for a properly functioning transmitter and receiver at 434 MHz while sticking to the ISM band limitations. Again, you can't judge RF issues like this except with the final board. A breadboard is essentially useless.

  • \$\begingroup\$ So, more or less, you suggest to proceed with pcb construction. \$\endgroup\$
    – TBELO
    Feb 20, 2017 at 22:19
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @TBELO Unless the manufacturer got evaluation boards you can use, then don't even consider using their parts. \$\endgroup\$
    – Lundin
    Feb 22, 2017 at 7:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.