0
\$\begingroup\$

We already know that we can derive the parameters \$\omega_{n}\$ and \$\zeta\$ from a second order system which adopts the canonical form:

\$ H(s) = K\frac{\omega_n^2}{s^2 + 2\zeta\omega_n s + \omega_n^2}\$

How can I find the damping ratio and the natural frequency of a second-order system with one or two zeros:

\$ H(s) = \frac{K_1s^2 + K_2s + K_3}{s^2 + K_4s + K_5}\$

\$ H(s) = \frac{K_1s + K_2}{s^2 + K_3s + K_4}\$

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ The numerator s-terms differentiate the classical 2nd order transient responses, so ROT performance parameters are not readily extracted. \$\endgroup\$
    – Chu
    Feb 26 '17 at 23:45
  • \$\begingroup\$ Natural frequency and damping factor are related to the denominator, its expression doesn't change in the cases of low, band or high pass systems. \$\endgroup\$ Nov 11 '17 at 15:50
-1
\$\begingroup\$

For a second-order system featuring a double zero, the transfer function could look that way:

$$ H(s)= H_0\frac{1 + a_1s + a_2s^2 }{ 1 + b_1s + b_2s^2} = H_0 \frac {N(s)}{D(s)}$$

you can rearrange both \$ N(s) \$ and \$ D(s) \$ under the form

\$ N(s) = 1 + (s/\omega_{0n}*Q_n) + (s/\omega_{0n})^2 \$ and \$ D(s) = 1 + (s/\omega_{0}*Q) + (s/\omega_{0})^2 \$

with \$ \omega_{0n} = 1/\sqrt{a_2} \$ and \$ Q_n = \sqrt{a_2}/a_1 \$ with \$ \omega_{0} = 1/\sqrt{b_2} \$ and \$ Q = \sqrt{b_2}/b_1 \$

In your first expression, factor \$ K_3 \$ on top and \$ K_5 \$ in \$ D(s) \$, you have

$$ H(s) = \frac{K_3}{K_5}\frac{(1 + \frac{sK_2}{K_3} + \frac{s^2K_1}{K_3}) }{ 1 + \frac{sK_4}{K_5} + \frac{s^2}{K_5}} $$ then apply what I described above.

Same for the second expression:

$$ H(s)= \frac{K_2}{K_4} \frac{(1 + sK_1/K_2) }{1 + \frac{sK_3}{K_4} + \frac{s^2}{K_4}} $$ then apply what I described above.

If you want to learn more about these techniques, have a look at the APEC presentation available here:

http://cbasso.pagesperso-orange.fr/Downloads/PPTs/Chris%20Basso%20APEC%20seminar%202016.pdf

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ Hello Laptop2d, thanks! This is much nicer indeed. I will try to use LaTeX next time. \$\endgroup\$ Mar 9 '17 at 20:43

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.