1
\$\begingroup\$

So I was solving some circuits with the use of Voltage Transformation and Laplace Transform and I came up with this circuit. I'm not sure how to solve for IL and IC.

R3 and V1 are the voltage transformation of a 2H inductor while R4 and V2 are the voltage transformation of a 1/2 F capacitor.

By observation, I think it would be easier to choose nodal analysis. However, I'm not sure how to properly arrange the components to limit the number of nodes/equations needed.

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ No Homework questions here please.. Try to solve the question, and if you're unable to proceed at some point, this forum could be of help then. \$\endgroup\$
    – V-Red
    Commented Apr 1, 2017 at 17:39
  • \$\begingroup\$ You can use either node or mesh analysis. You will need the same number of equations to find the same number of unknowns. \$\endgroup\$
    – The Photon
    Commented Apr 1, 2017 at 18:00

1 Answer 1

1
\$\begingroup\$

To be solved by Laplace transforms, the entire circuit must be in the frequency domain. Therefore I2 must be represented by 2/(S+1). The 4 for V1 states that Il=2A at t=0+. When the topological graph is drawn for the circuit (opening current sources and shorting voltage sources), there is only one loop around which to write a mesh equation which is: (2/s)Ic+(2S)Il+Ir2+3Ir1=4-4/S; where Ir2 is the downward current in R2. Along with ancillary equations relating the various currents, we finally get: Il=(2S^2+5S+2)/(S+1)^3. Using partial fraction expansion and taking the inverse Laplace transform we get: i(t)=[(-1/2)t^2 + t + 2)]e^-t). As a check, evaluating at t=0+, we get il(0+)=2 which is expected.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.