As I'm going to design my first high-speed PCB, I'm confused with some mismatches between what i see in high-speed PCB design tutorials and what i see in real world designs. in the PCB handbook named "RIGHT THE FIRST TIME" by "LEE W. RITCHEY", it's discussed that the transmission lines higher than 1/4 TEL will fail from reflection. In some boards like raspberry pi 3 and banana pi BPI-M64, i don't see any termination resistor between Processor and RAM IC(s). As the frequency of the Allwinner A64 and 4 512 DDR3 RAMS in BPI-M64 is about 800MHz i think 1/4 TEL is less than 1 Centimeter but in the board I see the routes are longer than 2 on 3 Cm without any termination. the The question is:

Is it realy possible to do such designs without termination resistors or I am calculating in a wrong way?

  • \$\begingroup\$ Careful, the Transmission Electrical Length has nothing(!) to do with your clock rate. It has to do with the highest significant frequency component in your rising edge. \$\endgroup\$
    – pfabri
    Aug 25, 2021 at 9:10

1 Answer 1


DDR3 has integrated (on-die) termination for the data lines, and Vtt termination for other lines. Therefore, not all lines require external termination resistors. You will find that several high-speed IO standards have integrated termination, as this avoid the parasitics, extra space, and extra routing of "regular" discrete termination.

I suggest you read this Altera DDR3 termination & layout guidelines document as well as this Wikipedia article: On-die termination and this presentation on DDR3/DDR3L/DDR4.

DDR3 termination is a very complicated subject, as different bits of the interface have different termination situations, as well as on-die termination which can also be dynamic (register settings can modify the value of the on-die termination). To better understand the nuances, you'll likely want to look at several DDR3 controller/DRAM datasheets and reference designs.

Finally, see TIDEP0012 for an example of a DDR3 reference design that does not use Vtt termination.

To sum up, DDR3 is somewhat of a special case when it comes to "conventional" high-speed digital designs, due to integrated features that make it easier to use. Ritchey's book is a good one, I would also suggest reading Howard Johnson's and Henry Ott's texts for more high-speed digital design considerations. Also, without looking at the schematics, it's difficult to fully understand the circuit at hand. Last I checked, the Raspi 3 was still closed hardware. Have you got a schematic? You'll have a far better time designing circuits by reading the datasheet and looking at reference designs than by trying to infer designs from closed hardware.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks a lot for your complete answer. That's all I need to know at this time. \$\endgroup\$
    – Milad
    Apr 16, 2017 at 5:25
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Also see LS1012ARDB for an example of a DDR3L reference design without any "off-die" termination. \$\endgroup\$
    – Luka
    Sep 20, 2019 at 13:19
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Fun fact: Dr Howard Johnson was a student of Lee Ritchey. \$\endgroup\$
    – pfabri
    Aug 25, 2021 at 9:14

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.