In class, we were given equations for the transformer in terms of number of turns primary/secondary and coupling coefficient K, however effect of distance between coils, presence/absence of core, and composition of core were not covered.

Of particular interest: What is the equation for 2 parallel straight wires? Clearly turn ratio is 1:1, but how to account for distance between the two?

  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ They are very big and made from a special metal that can turn into a car. \$\endgroup\$ Apr 24 '12 at 21:14
  • \$\begingroup\$ I am so sorry.. \$\endgroup\$ Apr 24 '12 at 21:15
  • \$\begingroup\$ Actually pretty funny \$\endgroup\$ Apr 24 '12 at 21:21
  • \$\begingroup\$ especially coming from robotics guy \$\endgroup\$ Apr 24 '12 at 21:30
  • \$\begingroup\$ If the two parallel straight wires are infinite in length and with zero thickness, the distance between the two doesn't matter at all, and therefore will not appear in any equation. \$\endgroup\$
    – Telaclavo
    Apr 25 '12 at 14:38

About the core

Consider an inductor, and the magnitic field that it generates:

enter image description here

it creates loops all around the windings, with a direction given by the direction of the current (see Ampère's law).

If you put two inductors close to each other, the changing (Credits to Curd) field generated by one will induce (sorry for the pun) a current in the other one, with the proportion given by the number of windings (because of Faraday's law of induction). But this coupling will be limited to the portion of the field which falls in the area of the second inductor, which can or cannot be a limited portion of the total.

Using a core, you force whe magnetic flux over a closed path, and the great part of it will follow that path:

enter image description here

This translates in a higher efficiency of the coupling, as almost all the magnetic field is induced in the secondary, as opposed to the previous case.

What happens with two wires?

If you have a single ideal wire, it also generates a magnetic field, again described by Ampère's law:

enter image description here

Since this field is distributed through all the wire, it will be much weaker than using windings, because these have the effect to concentrate this field into the inner space (where is the core).

As for inductors, distance reduces the portion of the magnetic field that the wires share, and with it the power transferred. Note that with the core, in the ideal case in which all the flux is convoyed the distance doesn't matter, as all the flux is into the core.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks to everybody, and clabaccio in particular, for the interesting info. I'm definitely far more comfortable with the physics now. However, couldn't I just get some equations? Pretty please? \$\endgroup\$ Apr 25 '12 at 14:41
  • \$\begingroup\$ Also, is fig. 2 any different from a bar core? \$\endgroup\$ Apr 25 '12 at 14:50
  • \$\begingroup\$ @JoeStavitsky If I understand what you mean, a bar core is not a closed loop, so it won't be the same. But I don't know anything more about that. \$\endgroup\$
    – clabacchio
    Apr 25 '12 at 14:54
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ The sloppy formulation "the field generated by one will induce a current in the other one" should be more exactly "the change of the field generated by one will induce a voltage in the other". U = d/dt Phi (Faraday's Law of Induction) \$\endgroup\$
    – Curd
    Apr 25 '12 at 20:17
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Curd thanks! I was going a bit superficially, but your correction is right \$\endgroup\$
    – clabacchio
    Apr 25 '12 at 21:32

With no core, distance decreases the coupling inductance and increases the leakage inductance. In the limiting case of two wires far apart, they each have only their inherent inductance, which is all leakage inductance if you view them together as a transformer.

In a perfect transformer, the leakage inductance is zero. If you were to put a resistor accross the secondary, the primary would appear to be just that resistance divided by the square of the turns ratio. For example, if you had a perfect 1:2 transformer and put 1 kΩ accross the secondary, the primary would look like a 250 Ω resistor and nothing else.

As coupling is decreased, such as by increasing distance, more of the primary's impedance comes from leakage inductance and the series component that is the resistor accross the secondary reflected to the primary gets less and less. Eventually at no coupling you have only the leakage inductance, which is the primary acting as a stand-alone inductor.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Sorry, what is leakage inductance? Also, what does the core do, and what effect does composition of the core have? \$\endgroup\$ Apr 24 '12 at 21:28
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ @Joe: Leakage inductance is the part of the windings inductance that is not coupled to other windings. It represents the magnetic field "private" to a winding such that it does not induce voltage or current in other windings. You can model a real transformer in part as a ideal transformer with leakage inductance in series with each winding. \$\endgroup\$ Apr 24 '12 at 21:40
  • \$\begingroup\$ ah, got it, now how about equation for distance vs mutual inductance? Also, cores?Thanks again \$\endgroup\$ Apr 24 '12 at 21:42

Imagine 2 water hoses.

One with water pointed to another hose to catch the water.

Without efficient coupling, you have a leaky hose and none is transferred. In that case the primary impedance is just that of the primary hose.

Knowing you are an engineering student with a brilliant imagination, and you know how iron filings collect around a wire to show the magnetic flux, you need to use laminated iron steel to couple the high power low frequency power to the secondary wire, or a ceramic ferrite core for higher frequencies that have smaller size and less loss than iron. The higher the F, the lower the permeability that can be used to become low loss.

But 50/60Hz can use big fat hoses or high µ magnetic common cores to join the primary secondary wires.

There are many shapes and sizes depending on whether you need a fire hose or a garden hose or a sewer hose.

But if you own a soldering gun, you have a transformer with many primary turns and only 1 secondary turn that will heat the heavy copper tip enough to melt solder in a second.

Now if this analogy is not clear, you could be a programmer. ;)


From Grover's Inductance Calculations Working Formulas and Tables, pg 31, the mutual (coupling) inductance betwen two equal parallel straight filaments is

\$M=0.002l \left[log_e\left(\frac{l}{d} + \sqrt{1 + \frac{l^2}{d^2}} \right)- \sqrt{1+\frac{d^2}{l^2}} + \frac{d}{l}\right]\$

\$l\$ is the length of the wire and \$d\$ is the distance between the wires.

In this expression the dimensions \$l\$ and \$d\$ are centimeters and the inductance is microhenrys.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.