Looking at this circuit, I'm wondering if the capacitor polarization "+" is correctly draw. Assuming T2 is in cut, T1 is on, left capacitor will have a 0.7v in its right side (connected to T1 emitter) and Vcc(without load) in its left side (connect to T2 collector).

enter image description here

Looking for this circuit in internet, all kind of draws appears.

Please, could someone help me to analyze the issue?

In fact, I'm wondering if polar capacitor can be used in this kind of circuits.


1 Answer 1


Good question.

First off, the polarity of the capacitors in your picture is the wrong way around. The + terminal should not be connected to the base of the transistors.

Why the circuit works (when the capacitor polarity is fixed in the drawing):

The base of the transistor will always be around 0.6 to 0.7V above ground (because the base-emitter junction behaves like a ordinary diode). This is where you connect the negative capacitor terminal.

Now two things can happen: The other transistor is turned off. In this case the capacitors positive terminal is connected to the supply voltage via the 22k resistor. All fine in this case.

The other case: The transistor is turned on. In this case the capacitor sees the collector-emitter saturation voltage, typically around 0.1 to 0.3V. The capacitor is reversed biased by about 0.5V!

Why does the circuit works nonetheless and does destroy the capacitors: Ordinary aluminium capacitors can withstand a reverse voltage of about 1V to 1.5V without taking damage. Since the maximum reverse voltage is well below 1V everything is fine.

If you breadboard this circuit and plan to use tantalum capacitors better check the data-sheet for the maximum allowed reverse voltage. Tantalum capacitors are much less forgiving than good old aluminium electrolyte caps.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks for your answer. If I understand, capacitor side connected to emitter is 0.7v, the other side is from Vcc(6v in this case) to 0.1v. In conclusion, current draw can destroy capacitor and, if capacitor is reversed, it works but only because capacitor accepts some amount of reverse. Could you change the phrase "why the circuiy works" to "why the circuit works (when the capacitor polarity is fixed in the draw)" or simular? \$\endgroup\$ Jun 5, 2017 at 9:29
  • \$\begingroup\$ No, the emitter side is either 0.1V or 6V (depends if the transistor is on or off). The basis side is always 0.7V . (All voltages plus/minus 0.1V in either direction). So the maximum reverse voltage is around 0.5V to 0.6V which is safe for AC applications. \$\endgroup\$ Jun 5, 2017 at 9:47
  • \$\begingroup\$ Previous comment applies to the scheme show in the question or to the corrected one (capacitor polarity reversed)? This part is the one I suggest to clarify. Thanks a lot. \$\endgroup\$ Jun 5, 2017 at 9:50
  • \$\begingroup\$ The corrected one. \$\endgroup\$ Jun 5, 2017 at 9:52
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Great answer! Can you asume that the capacitance of the reverse biased capacitor is the same as when it is forward biased? Is the capacitor degraded in any way when it is reverse biased with a small voltage (0.7V)? \$\endgroup\$ May 18, 2020 at 9:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.