2
\$\begingroup\$

I'm designing a circuit, and a section of it is as follows:

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

What circuit can i use to allow OA1 to follow the Non-inverting input from 0 to 5V exactly, and anything above 5V in the input remains 5V on the output?

(i thought of using 2 resistors or a trimmer to reduce voltage on the input, but i have no use of the 5-10V range, and i want to use the full 0-5V range on the output)

(the 0-10V input is not available for redesign, the OA2 doesn't exists, but i placed it there to signify a high impedance circuit after the output.)

Note: I'm trying to be accurate, i could use a resistor+zener diode on the Output to limit to the closer commercial value for zeners eg. 5.6V, but there must be a better and more precise way to do this..

|improve this question
\$\endgroup\$
3
\$\begingroup\$

Here's my solution:

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

How it works is that the 3rd opamp will compare Vlim against a 5 V reference voltage. As soon as the voltage rises above the 5 V reference, the output of OA3 will go low this basically works as an ideal 5 V zener diode. As soon as Vlim goes below 5 V, OA3's output will become high and the diode will be in reverse mode.

So the diode is to prevent OA3 interfering when Vlim < 5 V

The accuracy of the 5 V clamping level is mainly determined by that level itself and the DC offsets of the OA3. The diode is in OA3's feedback loop so the voltage drop across it does not matter.

|improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Really simple solution, only adds an OpAmp, 1xDiode, 3xResistors (got Vref from the 24V). The simulation works perfect. I'll test this on my circuit to see if Real punches Ideal in the face. \$\endgroup\$ – ndelucca Jun 29 '17 at 12:35
  • \$\begingroup\$ The circuit works fine. I used a 7805 to get a better and fixed 5V Vref. Looks very stable. Thank you. \$\endgroup\$ – ndelucca Jun 29 '17 at 18:52
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Bimpelrekkie if the buffer had gain, would you want to put the op amp clipper on the input rather than the output to avoid input offset error? I guess you'd be adding input capacitance which could be a problem if this was a fast circuit. \$\endgroup\$ – DavidG25 Jun 29 '17 at 23:36
  • \$\begingroup\$ No I'd still want to clip at the output as gain makes the input more sensitive so OA3's offset would also be amplified. In this circuit the speed is limited by the bandwidth and slew-rate of the opamps. Opamp input capacitance will influence much less than that. \$\endgroup\$ – Bimpelrekkie Jun 30 '17 at 14:03
1
\$\begingroup\$

A web search for opamp min-max circuits some time ago led me to a fascinating AD8036 Voltage Feedback Clamp Amp from Analog Devices. This device, when used in non-inverting mode can clamp the input voltage between an upper and lower limit.

enter image description here

Figure 2. Clamp-amp block diagram. (See page 16 of the datasheet.) \$ +V_{IN} \$ is applied to A1's non-inverting input until \$ +V_{IN} > V_H \$ at which point S1 applies \$ V_H \$ to A1. Similarly when \$ +V_{IN} < V_L \$ S1 applies \$ V_L \$ to A1.

There are a few limitations to the device - particularly the supply voltages (+/- 3 to +/- 5 V) and 6.3 V max \$ \Delta \$V between \$V_H\$ and \$V_L\$ - but you can work around those by, for example, working in the 0 to 1 V range on your inputs and putting a x 5 amplifier afterwards.

enter image description here

|improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ I think TI has one too with the OPA699. I use one and I slam it into its lower clamp voltage quite fast and it has very nice clamp recovery. Very little distortion. \$\endgroup\$ – DavidG25 Jun 28 '17 at 22:10
1
\$\begingroup\$

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab Might have to change the resistor values, but the ratio is there and you get the idea.

|improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Wouldn't this be pretty bad in terms of SNR? Your input signal is 1/5th of the original signal + zener and resistor noise? \$\endgroup\$ – DavidG25 Jun 28 '17 at 23:46
1
\$\begingroup\$

Just make the positive voltage rail +5V rather than 24V and use a rail to rail op amp.

You could get 5V from 24 with a linear regulator or build your own with a voltage divider buffered by another op amp and a pass transistor.

The circuit may not have great ac characteristics if you're going to be slamming the op amp into the 5V rail.

|improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Good suggestion, but i'm using stock components, and don't have any rail-to-rail opamps. I'll be going for Bimpelrekkie's solution. \$\endgroup\$ – ndelucca Jun 29 '17 at 18:55
  • \$\begingroup\$ It doesn't have to be rail to rail. I couldn't find the relationship between the positive supply voltage and the maximum output voltage for the LM358, but with a simple experiment you could set the positive supply a little above 5V so that the LM358 saturated at 5V. The only thing is that the voltage you will need for the positive supply may not be a common linear regulator output and so you'll have to get it from a voltage divider buffered by another op amp, but you were going to use a second op amp anyway. \$\endgroup\$ – DavidG25 Jun 29 '17 at 19:00
  • \$\begingroup\$ Bimpelrekkie's solution is probably more linear though. \$\endgroup\$ – DavidG25 Jun 29 '17 at 19:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.