0
\$\begingroup\$

Consider the following circuit:

enter image description here

It is required to calculate the small signal voltage gain (i.e \$\frac{v_o}{v_i}\$) based on \$R_s, R_c, I_c, V_A\$ and β.

So I draw the small signal model as below:

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

So, for \$A_v\$ we have:

\$v_o = g_m v_{be} (r_o || R_c)\$

\$v_{be} = v_i \frac{rπ}{(rπ + Rs)}\$

so:

\$A_v = \frac{v_o}{v_i} = g_m \frac{r_π}{R_s + r_π} (r_o || R_c)\$

I think everything is okay so far! Am I right?

In the next part of question, I have been asked to find the value of \$I_c\$ which we have maximum \$A_v\$ for it. I have been stuck in this point.

Would you please give me some hints?

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Hint: Think about when does the circuit become non-linear? \$\endgroup\$ – The Photon Aug 4 '17 at 15:04
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Abraham, try using \\$\frac{A}{B}\\$ in the future, it will look like this: \$\frac{A}{B}\$. It's much easier to read. Also, it will make people not give up because of poor formatting. Just look at this: vo = gm vbe (ro || Rc) => \$V_O = gm×V_{BE}×(R_O||R_C)\$ \$\endgroup\$ – Harry Svensson Aug 4 '17 at 15:07
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ \$R_C\$ => R_C, \$R_C^2\$ => R_C^2, \$V_{BE}\$ => V_{BE}, \$1.3×10^5\$ => 1.3×10^5, alt gr + shift + * = ×, alt gr + shift + Q = Ω. at least those shortcuts works on my nordic Swedish keyboard. \$\endgroup\$ – Harry Svensson Aug 4 '17 at 15:23
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ MathJax tutorial is here. Unlike other SE sites, EE uses \$ instead of just $ to start and end inline math, since prices of things are often on-topic here. \$\endgroup\$ – The Photon Aug 4 '17 at 15:43
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ The gain is missing a negative sign, min Ic is 0 max Ic is Vcc/RC which value is best between the two \$\endgroup\$ – sstobbe Aug 4 '17 at 15:43
2
\$\begingroup\$

Max gain for a CE topology is VDD / 0.026 volts. Assuming the Vsource drives the base directly.

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ I really do not understand it, this does not give me any sense... (btw., neither you specify what VDD means). I have never, either nowhere, seen anything like that. Would you be so kind and provide a reference proving your claims? \$\endgroup\$ – Eric Best Jun 25 '18 at 16:04
  • \$\begingroup\$ Maximim gain (without feedback) - and assuming DIRECT base drive - is Gmax=gmRc=IcRc/Vt=(Vcc-Vce)/Vt=0.5*Vcc/0.026. Here I have assumed Vce=0.5*Vcc (which is best for symmetric operation). \$\endgroup\$ – LvW Dec 4 '18 at 14:01
0
\$\begingroup\$

Quick estimate.

Ib is vi/Rs

Ic is beta x Ib or beta x vi / Rs

Vout is Ic x Rc = beta x Rc / Rs x vi

You can get the gain from that quickly.

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ The first equation assumes that the base node is at ground potential. (A very quick and very rough estimate). \$\endgroup\$ – LvW Dec 4 '18 at 13:52
0
\$\begingroup\$

The task is to calculate the small-signal voltage gain based on \$R_s\$, \$R_c\$, \$I_c\$, \$V_A\$, and \$ \beta \$ for the given schematic diagram. Therefore, the small-signal model you have drawn does not correspond to the task because you have used small-signal parameters (\$r_\pi \$, \$g_m\$, and \$r_o\$) different from the required ones. Also, you do not specify anywhere what \$V_A\$ means, neither you use it and I must confess I do not have any idea as to its meaning here (any suggestion?). However, the designation \$ \beta \$ is normally used as a synonym for the hybrid small-signal parameter \$h_{21e}\$ (the suffix e indicates the common emitter topology), so it is obvious the small-signal model based on the \$h_e\$-parameters was assumed to be used for the calculations. The explored circuit including the mentioned full small-signal model then looks like this:

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

The corresponding equations of that model are as follows:

\$ v_1 = h_{11e} \cdot i_1 + h_{12e} \cdot v_2 \$

\$ i_2 = h_{21e} \cdot i_1 + h_{22e} \cdot v_2 \$

and the equations for the whole explored circuit can obviously be written as:

\$ V_i = (R_s + h_{11e}) \cdot i_1 + h_{12e} \cdot V_o \$

\$ -\frac{V_o}{R_c} = h_{21e} \cdot i_1 + h_{22e} \cdot V_o \$

From the above equations there can be derived the small-signal voltage gain \$ A_v \$ of the circuit:

\$ A_v = \frac{V_o}{V_i} = \frac{1}{h_{12e} - \frac{(R_s + h_{11e}) \cdot (h_{22e} + \frac{1}{R_c})}{h_{21e}}} = \frac{-h_{21e} \cdot R_c}{(R_s + h_{11e}) \cdot (h_{22e} \cdot R_c + 1) - h_{12e} \cdot h_{21e}} = \frac{-\beta \cdot R_c}{(R_s + h_{11e}) \cdot (h_{22e} \cdot R_c + 1) - h_{12e} \cdot \beta} \$

In the first approximation, let's presume both \$ h_{12e} \rightarrow 0 \$ and \$ h_{22e} \rightarrow 0 \$, then the formula would simplify to:

\$ A_v = \frac{-h_{21e} \cdot R_c}{R_s + h_{11e}} = \frac{-\beta \cdot R_c}{R_s + h_{11e}} \$

To find the \$I_c \$ at which the voltage gain has its maximum, the h-parameters as functions of \$I_c \$ have to be known (they are nonlinear functions, of course; W. Shockley transistor equations). Then the first derivative \$ \frac{\partial A_v}{\partial I_c}\$ of the function \$ A_v = f(I_c) \$ has to be set to 0 and the corresponding \$I_c(\frac{\partial A_v}{\partial I_c}=0) \$ expressed out of it. The second condition for the gain to be a maximum is that the second derivative of the same function at that calculated \$I_c \$ has to be less than 0. In fact, if the function in charge is known, it can also be plotted and its maximum found this way.

Another view: the maximum theoretical accessible amplitude of the amplified signal is \$ \frac{V_{cc}}{2} \$, it means the operating point must be set to \$ I_c = \frac{V_{cc}}{2R_c} \$.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.