Is it possible to connect multiple electret microphones in order to increase sensitivity (gain) of the microphone(s)? If yes, how do I connect them?

Obviously one solution is to increase the number of amplifiers, but I am curious if multiple microphones can be serial connected - so this is more like a theoretical question (unless it is possible to do it - then it becomes a practical question) :)

  • \$\begingroup\$ When you say "sensitivity", are you referring to the gain (in dB) of a microphone? \$\endgroup\$ – KingDuken Aug 17 '17 at 16:31
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ No. The sensitivity is a matter of microphone design (physical and electrical.) Piling more of them in parallel (or series) will apply them in ways they weren't designed to operate and it will decrease performance (or worse.) You can look into microphone beam forming or other methods of combining arrays of microphones to improve overall signal or other characteristics. But they are non-trivial and you seem to be asking for only trivial solutions. You might also consider an "ear trumpet" addition. \$\endgroup\$ – jonk Aug 17 '17 at 16:45
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Shure actually has a small article about connecting microphones in parallel. You can see that here. Funny, because they just updated the article yesterday. \$\endgroup\$ – KingDuken Aug 17 '17 at 16:46
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Found it. The shotgun sound snooper. \$\endgroup\$ – JRE Aug 17 '17 at 18:02
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ By the way: a microphone doesn't necessarily add less noise than an amplifier. And an amplifier doesn't have to be a battery killer. \$\endgroup\$ – JRE Aug 17 '17 at 18:53

I am a technician at a boutique mic company. I like to build electret mics in my spare time.

You can increase sensitivity, gain, and signal to noise ratio by running multiple electrets in PARALLEL-not series. This works because:

1) each capsule has an onboard JFET. When combining noise from multiple FETs, some of it cancels. Two amps= -3dB, four amps= -6dB of noise reduction [see Small Signal Audio Design by Douglas Self, Routledge 2010].
2) Multiple elements will have lower output impedance, which can mean less noisy makeup gain down the line.
3) More diaphragm area means more sensitivity, which makes sense. It also means less self noise, for reasons that I don't really understand - but that's the principle behind the $3500 Audio Technica AT5047 (FOUR diaphragms!).

If you end up with a signal that is too hot and distorts the next stage, put a 10ohm resistor on the audio output of each capsule before wiring them in parallel. This averages rather than sums the outputs.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Welcome to Electrical Engineering. You are starting with good answers. \$\endgroup\$ – Grebu Nov 20 '18 at 21:18
  • \$\begingroup\$ will some of the "good" signal (not the noise) cancel also itself? because not all microphones are perfect parallels (I mean to the physical surface they are mounted on), they will generate slightly different signals. \$\endgroup\$ – Ultralisk Feb 4 '19 at 10:50
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Rigel Yes, comb filtering. It'll mostly be in the ultrasonic, not worth worrying about too much. Also audible-range comb filtering is so common in everyday life, that it's often basically unnoticeable, so even when you suspect there might be issues, it's worth trying regardless. \$\endgroup\$ – Siana May 2 '19 at 10:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.