It might be a silly question but I can't figure out in what cases a flash mass erase from in-application programming (IAP) is relevant, as it would erase the user code as well?
For STM32 devices, ST provides example code in reference manuals like this one:
A.2.4 Mass erase sequence code example
/* (1) Set the MER bit in the FLASH_CR register to enable mass erasing */
/* (2) Set the STRT bit in the FLASH_CR register to start the erasing */
/* (3) Wait until the BSY bit is reset in the FLASH_SR register */
/* (4) Check the EOP flag in the FLASH_SR register */
/* (5) Clear EOP flag by software by writing EOP at 1 */
/* (6) Reset the PER Bit to disable the mass erase */
FLASH->CR |= FLASH_CR_MER; /* (1) */
FLASH->CR |= FLASH_CR_STRT; /* (2) */
while ((FLASH->SR & FLASH_SR_BSY) != 0) /* (3) */
{
/* For robust implementation, add here time-out management */
}
if ((FLASH->SR & FLASH_SR_EOP) != 0) /* (4)*/
{
FLASH->SR = FLASH_SR_EOP; /* (5) */
}
else
{
/* Manage the error cases */
}
FLASH->CR &= ~FLASH_CR_MER; /* (6) */
I don't understand how the CPU can reach the instructions from (3) to (6).
Shouldn't they be erased already?