In my previous question I focused on lead-based solder alloys (see Best solder wire - Sn63Pb37 vs Sn60Pb40 vs ...?).

Some of you brought new exciting solder alloys to my attention. The two most promising types contain either Bismuth or Indium.

Some questions:

  • How do they compare to each other on properties like:

    • wetting of pads and pins
    • interaction with fluxes
    • joint strength - brittleness (is this directly related to the "tensile strength (PSI)" column in the table below? Please enlighten me.)
    • price
    • ...
  • How do they compare to standard solder alloys, like Sn60Pb40?

  • Any drawbacks?

  • Most of them are sold without flux core. Wouldn't that make the solder process very difficult?

  • What kind of flux should one use with Bismuth and/or Indium based solders?


Perhaps the following table might be of help:

enter image description here

This table comes from "Indium Corporation".

  • \$\begingroup\$ This isn't a discussion site. We give specific answers to specific questions, not broad discussions of wide ranges of choices. \$\endgroup\$
    – The Photon
    Sep 20, 2017 at 17:47
  • \$\begingroup\$ @ThePhoton you're right. I will rephrase it a bit... \$\endgroup\$
    – K.Mulier
    Sep 20, 2017 at 17:48

2 Answers 2


They are very expensive. Some of them are outright forbidden (e.g. all Cadmium based alloys). These special alloys are made for special needs: Low temperature soldering (e.g. if you have a 100°C thermal fuse, you cannot solder it with normal solder), low EMF (e.g. if you want to measure voltages with <100µV of accuracy), etc pp. Unless you are doing very special stuff you will not need them.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Low EMF is a concern for me, as I sometimes make sensitive analog circuits. Please tell me more about how these solder alloys can improve the EMF... \$\endgroup\$
    – K.Mulier
    Sep 20, 2017 at 18:12
  • \$\begingroup\$ Even if your analog circuit is sensitive, it does not mean you will get any benefit from low EMF solder. The usual electric contacts we use have something like 1-10µV/°C. Your average opamp will have have an order of magnitude higher temperature coefficient or even just plain drift, not to mention the sensor you are using. Also keep in mind this is a DC offset. Unless you are measuring very low frequencies, it does not matter. To learn more, just google for EMF or Seebeck effect. \$\endgroup\$ Sep 20, 2017 at 18:37
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @AliChen though I obviously agree that normal lead-free tin is really annoying to work with – please don't deride those regulations as idiotic. In prototyping and specialty applications, the amount of lead may not pose a health or environmental risk, but in mass-produced consumer applications it does sum up to a significant one. And high-tech industrial production has proven to be quite capable of making good, reliable electronics without any lead, so what's the point... \$\endgroup\$ Sep 20, 2017 at 21:07
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @leftaroundabout, I maintain that ROHS is idiocy. The logic behind is inherently faulty. The regulation replaces well-studied lead with a bunch of different kind of heavy metals, for which medicine has no foggiest clue about their health impact, simply because there were no sufficient studies, yet. Lead is harmful in a form of salts. Yet there are miles and miles of car salvages with broken lead-acid batteries leaking into soils and underground aquifers. No problem here, right? \$\endgroup\$ Sep 20, 2017 at 21:23
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ @AliChen Sure there's a problem there! And you're probably right, car batteries are a bigger problem. However these batteries are rather well-controlled and a big part recycled; the obvious and much more direct danger of the corrosive acid makes this somewhat inevitable. Electronics are far more commonly dumped, smashed, perhaps even chewed on... that has little direct harm, making long-term issues easier to sneak along. — The main components of the common SAC solder are studied just as well as lead. Sure, other heavy metals are used too, but in far lower proportion if only due to cost. \$\endgroup\$ Sep 23, 2017 at 11:22

Soldering alloys have many properties that target different applications: malleability, melting point, solidification point, expansion, etc. See this selection from major supplier, Indium Corporation. There used to be some open tables with bunch of parameters, but I can't find it easily.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Thank you very much. Do you have personal experience with either Bismuth- or Indium-based solders? \$\endgroup\$
    – K.Mulier
    Sep 20, 2017 at 18:16
  • \$\begingroup\$ @K.Mulier, yes, I do have some experience. At one point (~10 years ago) I made an alloy with T=100-120C per Indium recipe, out of individual metals, and soldered a heat pipe to exposed pad of a video adapter chip, with a set of flat fins at the other end, making a silent heat sink. \$\endgroup\$ Sep 20, 2017 at 19:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.