12
\$\begingroup\$

I have a strange issue with the LED backlights of the LCD monitor i'm using. I have had it for about 5 years and up until this time have run it at only 10% brightness to reduce eye strain. However recently I have had an issue where some of the LEDs that make up the backlight will switch off leading to dark areas of the screen.

The problem is getting progressively worse. I bumped the brightness to 25% when I first had the issue a year ago and that caused the problem to go away, more recently I have bumped it up to 50% when it reoccurred but today it did it again and I now have to run it at 75% brightness which is starting to cause eye strain.

Is this an issue with the LED requiring more power to run as the semiconductors wear? does running LEDs at low power for years on end do extra damage? Or could it be another problem that I could fix?

\$\endgroup\$
9
  • 8
    \$\begingroup\$ I would call it abnormal for an LED backlit monitor to age this quickly. But excitation energy related thresholds do increase with age, but I've never seen it this bad. Perhaps from 5% to 10% is expected but not 10% to 75%. \$\endgroup\$
    – D.A.S.
    Commented Sep 24, 2017 at 18:33
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ It seems that some LEDs are short and consume more current. As a result, the voltage on other LEDs becomes smaller. \$\endgroup\$
    – AltAir
    Commented Sep 24, 2017 at 18:38
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ It is all about quality. Very cheap leds age fast. Very cheap white leds age even more faster. I bought the cheapest white leds on Ebay, set them at 20mA and after three months the brightness was reduced to 50% (to the human eye). Then I tried with 10mA and that was about the same. Three month is about 2000 hours. A good bright led might last 20000 hours, and a very good led 50000 hours. However, you need a good reliable brand, because any manufacturer can say that their leds is 50000 hours. \$\endgroup\$
    – Jot
    Commented Sep 24, 2017 at 18:51
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Is it a switch like threshold or gradual? Is there a pattern on the screen? \$\endgroup\$
    – D.A.S.
    Commented Sep 24, 2017 at 19:04
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ It would be instructive to give the actual monitor model. \$\endgroup\$
    – pipe
    Commented Sep 25, 2017 at 10:41

2 Answers 2

25
\$\begingroup\$

The problem you are seeing is related to the construction of LED backlight circuits which require lots of LEDs. Often on poorly designed or "cheapo" designs there are LEDs or series strings of LEDs that are connected in parallel. See the typical diagram below for reference:

enter image description here

The problem comes into play here when the forward voltage drops of each string of LEDs are not the same. The string with the lowest forward voltage takes most of the current and is thus the brightest. In the worst case one string has a forward drop so much higher that it will not even light.

In your case what you are most likely seeing is that as the monitor has aged the forward voltage drop of some strings has either dropped or increased. Your having to increase the brightness level has to do with increasing the net drive to the parallel strings so that even those with the higher voltage drop are still able to light enough so you can see them.

A much better design for a backlight LED array will use a separate current source or sink for each of the series string. The schematic below shows an example. This of course adds cost and a monitor manufacturer in a competitive market may choose the simpler circuit at the loss of overall quality.

enter image description here

This forward voltage drop phenomenon can be seen in the cheapest LED flashlights where they try to use many extremely cheap LEDs in place of a much brighter single LED. An example flashlight, as seen below, will show some LEDs start to flicker or simply stop lighting at all as the battery voltage reduces as it discharges. When LED flashlights first appeared most were built this way but as the technology has improved most devices you find today will be using the single LED.

enter image description here

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ great answer, totally makes sense. As I recall my monitor a "benQ" was quite well priced at the time so would not be surprised if they cut corners. It's a shame monitors don't advertise this sort of info so I would know which ones to buy or avoid in the future. \$\endgroup\$
    – daedalus
    Commented Sep 24, 2017 at 19:30
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I just read BenQ's service manual which uses PWM with 3.3V , so all the LEDS are in parallel, perhaps with 1 Ohm series R's ideally to compensate for ESR variations. If no series R then they must be matched for intensity and Vf for consistent brightness and hence no threshold effects. Thus the PWM can control brightness. But if the supply voltage drops from 3.3 to 2.8V then LED dropout may occur due to Shockley NTC effect and result on current sharing. So I would check BKLT 3.3V level for DC and AC ripple and check caps for bulging. The LED does not resemble the schematics shown here. \$\endgroup\$
    – D.A.S.
    Commented Sep 24, 2017 at 21:44
10
\$\begingroup\$

Yes, even LEDs do not have an infinite lifetime.

However, when run at a low enough power such that they do not heat up much a lifetime of 50000 hours can be expected. 50000 hours when operated 24 hours a day every day is about 6 years.

If the LEDs operate under warm or even hot conditions this lifetime will reduce dramatically. But since you were using the backlight at a low setting I would expect that the LEDs would have been running at a relatively low power.

If ageing is indeed the problem then turning the brightness up will make things worse as you will be stressing the LEDs even more.

In theory you could replace the backlight but I doubt that it would be cost effective even if you can find the parts. Replacing the individual LEDs is not easy to do and I doubt if you can alight them properly (by hand) to get the required evenness in lighting. Personally, I'd just get a new monitor.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.