0
\$\begingroup\$

Why is always prefered the value of 0.1u as decoupling capacitors that they placed very close to the chips? Why don't use larger, like 0.22u, 0.47u, 0.68u or 1u for example?

\$\endgroup\$
7
  • 6
    \$\begingroup\$ It used to be 0.1uF ceramics were the biggest and cheapest devices available and were a nice physical size that matched the dip package. Today you can get and use larger values. \$\endgroup\$
    – Trevor_G
    Commented Sep 28, 2017 at 18:23
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ related \$\endgroup\$
    – The Photon
    Commented Sep 28, 2017 at 18:28
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ also related \$\endgroup\$
    – The Photon
    Commented Sep 28, 2017 at 18:29
  • 5
    \$\begingroup\$ Modern tiny high capacitance caps lose a lot of capacity at typical DC bias values anyway. In fact the voltage rating has more to do with the capacitance loss than breakdown in many cases (you can think of it as analogous to saturation in inductors at higher currents). \$\endgroup\$ Commented Sep 28, 2017 at 19:18
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ Larger capacitors are not, in general, good for decoupling because they have low self-resonant frequencies. \$\endgroup\$
    – dirac16
    Commented Sep 28, 2017 at 19:27

1 Answer 1

1
\$\begingroup\$

0.1uF capacitors may attenuate higher frequencies better than, say, a 1uF capacitor due to larger (SMD) capacitors having more inductance.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ That was true in the 90's, but not today. 1µF is readily available in 0402 package. You can even get as high as 22µF in 0402 package(!) \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 14, 2019 at 0:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.