1
\$\begingroup\$

Figure for the practice problem 13.9

I am studying Fundamental of Electric Circuits by Alexander and Sadiku, and I am not able to solve a practice problem 13.9 about ideal transformer in Chapter 13 of the textbook. My answer is different from that provided by the textbook and I am not able to find a reference solution on internet.

As shown in the above plot, the problem asks to find \$V_0\$.

I assumes the currents of the three meshes (bottom left, bottom right and top right) are \$I_1, I_2, I_3\$ defined in clockwise directions, and the voltages at the two sides of the ideal transformers are \$V_1, V_2\$ with positive defined at the points marked by red dot. Then I wrote down the following equations

$$120 - 4 I_1 - V_1 = 0 \,\,\,\;\;\;\;\;\;\;(1)$$ $$-V_2 - 2 (I_2 - I_3) - 8 I_2 = 0\;\;\;\;\;\;\;(2)$$ $$-8 I_3 - 2 (I_3 - I_2) = 0\;\;\;\;\;\;(3) $$ $$V_1 = V_2 /2 \;\;\;\;\;\;(4)$$ $$V_1 (I_1 - I_3 ) = -V_2 (I_2 - I_3)\;\;\;\;\;\;(5)$$

Here Eqs.(1-3) are due to Kirchhoff's voltage law (KVL), Eq.(4-5) are due to ideal transformer, while the last one states that there is no energy loss. We note that the currents go through the two sides of the transformer are \$(I_1-I_3)\$ and \$(I_2-I_3)\$ respectively.

However, by solving the above equations, I got \$V_0=-18.46\$ V, different from the result provided by the textbook \$V_0=48\$ V. I checked several times the equations and the solutions, but cannot figure out my mistake.

P.S.

I used the following short mathematica script to solve the above equations, if it provides any convenience.

 sol = Solve[120 - 4 I1 - V1 == 0 
  && -V2 - 2 (I2 - I3) - 8 I2 == 0 
  && -8 I3 - 2 (I3 - I2) == 0 && V1 ==    V2 /2  
  && V1 (I1 - I3 ) ==  -V2 (I2 - I3) , {I1, I2, I3, V1, V2}]
 N[8 I3 ] /. sol

Edit

Bumping my brain against user287001's nodal analysis, I found the mistake in my mesh analysis. The third equation above jumps from one side of the transformer to anther while overlooking the voltage difference. The correct one reads

$$-8 I_3 - 2 (I_3 - I_2) + (V_1 + V_2) = 0\;\;\;\;\;(3') $$

Calculations using Mathematica confirmed the result. Lesson learned.

\$\endgroup\$
0
5
\$\begingroup\$

Many of us have quite low brain capacity. For example your equations have too much variables at least for me. I can't at a glance see, is somewhere an error. But here's one proper solution. The facts are collected to equations with smaller number of variables: enter image description here

The equations are

  • Kirchoff's current laws in nodes A and B
  • an expression for the current of R2 (actually it's Kirchoff's voltage law in loop R2-R3-transformer)

All terms are moved to the left side to get zeros to the right sides.

The solution is found by MS Excel Solver:

enter image description here

The orange area has the modified variables. The blue area has the left sides of the three equations. The yellow area is the goal - make this zero. It's the sum of the squares of the left sides.

The result: V0 = 48V

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ really appreciated! \$\endgroup\$ – gamebm Oct 7 '17 at 18:40
  • \$\begingroup\$ Nice Excell solver by the way! \$\endgroup\$ – gamebm Oct 7 '17 at 18:47
2
\$\begingroup\$

The 48v at least in simulation seems plausible (~47.7v):

enter image description here

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thx for the help! \$\endgroup\$ – gamebm Oct 7 '17 at 18:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.