0
\$\begingroup\$

I am trying to simplify the following portion of a circuit for analysis. I am not sure if it would simply be shown as 2 resistors in parallel or something else as the nodes are connected. I do not have the resistor values currently, so I need to derive an equation for the resistance at a,b, and c.

Edit: I am looking for the resistance between a-b and b-c.

enter image description here

Thanks

\$\endgroup\$
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Resistance requires two points. So do you mean the resistance between a and b, a and c, and b and c? \$\endgroup\$ – jonk Oct 16 '17 at 4:15
  • \$\begingroup\$ a to b and b to c, I clarified in the edit. \$\endgroup\$ – thePinochleKid Oct 16 '17 at 4:41
  • \$\begingroup\$ Well, resistance from b to c shorts out \$R_1\$ and \$R_2\$, so they don't matter. That just leaves two resistors to deal with. The same is true for the resistance from a to b, except now \$R_3\$ and \$R_4\$ are shorted out and don't matter. For the case of a to c, it's a little bit different. But you don't care about that case. \$\endgroup\$ – jonk Oct 16 '17 at 4:46
  • \$\begingroup\$ Just to complete my understanding, can you explain a-c should it come up? Thanks for answering my question up to this point \$\endgroup\$ – thePinochleKid Oct 16 '17 at 4:49
  • \$\begingroup\$ That case is just \$R_1\mid\mid R_2+R_3\mid\mid R_4\$. \$\endgroup\$ – jonk Oct 16 '17 at 5:03
0
\$\begingroup\$

The equivalent resistance (aka impedance) that can replace resistors in parallel can be written like this:

\$R_{parallel} = \frac{1}{\frac{1}{R_1}+\frac{1}{R_2}+..}Ω\$

This means that if \$R_1 = 53Ω\$ and \$R_2= 205Ω\$ then you can replace both of those two with one resistor that has the value \$\frac{1}{\frac{1}{53}+\frac{1}{205}}=42.1Ω\$

Or it can be written like this if it's just two resistors in parallel.

\$R_{parallel} = \frac{R_1×R_2}{R_1+R_2}\$

With the same example numbers as above, \$\frac{53×205}{53+205}=42.1Ω\$

For 3 resistors in parallel it's not \$\frac{R_1×R_2×R_3}{R_1+R_2+R_3}\$, it's \$\frac{R_1×R_2×R_3}{R_1×R_2+R_2×R_3+R_1×R_3}\$. I derived this expression from the first equation above (\$\frac{1}{...}\$).

The equivalent resistance that can replace resistors in series can be written like this:

\$R_{series} = R_1+R_2+...\$

When I write "..." I mean that the terms can be repeated if you have more resistors.


With the information above together with the schematic we can arrive to the conclusion:

The resistance between a and rotated b is equal to \$\frac{R_1×R_2}{R_1+R_2}\$

The resistance between rotated b and c is equal to \$\frac{R_3×R_4}{R_3+R_4}\$

The resistance between a and c is equal to \$\frac{R_1×R_2}{R_1+R_2}\$+\$\frac{R_3×R_4}{R_3+R_4}\$

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.