I need a battery balance circuit, that I will either buy or design. I have seen serpentine routing between the load resistor and switching component in these photos (from china). In addition, it is not on the gate pin.

Could you please give some information about that?

I checked this question:Purpose of "wave shaped" PCB traces

I don't think I need "delay" and "Equalisation of length of pairs of traces". What could be the purpose of this routing?

Thanks a lot.

Battery protection

Battery protection 2

  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ I agree that it seems rather strange. \$\endgroup\$ – mkeith Dec 6 '17 at 6:08
  • 5
    \$\begingroup\$ looks like an inductor or a really cheap fuse \$\endgroup\$ – jsotola Dec 6 '17 at 6:50
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ This is not a protection circuit, it's a balancer. \$\endgroup\$ – Bruce Abbott Dec 6 '17 at 7:55
  • 6
    \$\begingroup\$ Gah! That flipped resistor! \$\endgroup\$ – pipe Dec 6 '17 at 8:47
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @pipe, one of the 100 Ohm resistors is flipped, too. \$\endgroup\$ – mkeith Dec 6 '17 at 8:53

It is thermal decoupling of the relatively small transistor from the power resistor. Such that they can be physically close without risking the power resistor heating up the transistor and causing it's characteristics to change.

Guessing this is a MOSFET (the top mark A2xxx is too vague to be sure) The source-drain resistance increases with temperature, leading to a rise in power dissipation and hence thermal runnaway.

Preventing the initial external heating would help prevent the possibility.

|improve this answer|||||
  • \$\begingroup\$ I wonder how much the "meander" helps, considering that the source trace is thicker, straight and passes right by the power resistor.. \$\endgroup\$ – Wesley Lee Dec 22 '17 at 16:56
  • \$\begingroup\$ I could not think of a better reason (other than mechanical decoupling which would not make sense given other things on the board). As I don't know the parameters or the circuit design there is no way for me to model it. I think this one would be down to the experience of the original engineer. My guess is they got it wrong first time and then added the meander to fix the issue. \$\endgroup\$ – Jason Morgan Dec 22 '17 at 17:16
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Btw the fuse idea is daft. The sot23 is good for at least 100mA, whereas that size of copper could probably handle 30-40A for a short while or 5A+ indefinately. Much longer than the sot23 would last. \$\endgroup\$ – Jason Morgan Dec 22 '17 at 17:33
  • \$\begingroup\$ Yeah, I'm not saying I disagree with you, just that it looks like a poor implementation of the idea. \$\endgroup\$ – Wesley Lee Dec 23 '17 at 2:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.