1
\$\begingroup\$

I am calculating parameters of the Thevenin's equivalent circuit as seen from the terminals A and B, for this circuit:

enter image description here

So I am following two steps.

Step 1

Calculate Thevenin's equivalent impedance Z_AB. Remove load, short all voltage sources and open circuit current sources. We get simplified circuit whith R3 removed and R1 and R2 connected in series. Therefore:

Z_AB = (R1 + R2) = 12

Step 2

Calculate Thevenin's equivalent voltage across A and B terminals using original circuit. Here's where I have some questions. I can calculate the voltage using KCL for center node (blue pixel, the only node in fact) and get

Step 2 : solution 1

Mark the voltage at the center node (blue pixel) by V1 and voltage source as E = 12. Applying KCL for this node gives:

(E - V1) / R1 + I1 = 0

(12 - V1) / 6 + 2 = 0

V1 = 24

Which seems to be the right result, confirmed by simulating this circuit in LTSpice:

enter image description here

Based on that voltage at terminal A can be calculated as V1 * R3 / (Z_AB + R3) = 24 * 4 / (12 + 4) = 6

Step 2 : solution 2

But if I try to apply complete Node analysis I cannot get correct result. I know it must work, so apparently I am doing something wrong. I would like to know where do I fail in my node analysis. My calculation:

YV = I

V = voltage at nodes matrix = [ V1 ]

Y = admittance matrix = [ 1/R1 + 1/(R2 + R3) ]

I = [ (E - V1) / R1 + I1 - V1 / (R2 + R3) ]

This gives:

V1/R1 + V1 / (R2 + R3) = (E - V1) / R1 + I1 - V1 / (R2 + R3)

Which would agree with previous result only if

V1/R1 + V1 / (R2 + R3) = 0

which is not the case.

Where is an error in my proper node analysis? I can see that I would get right answer if Y = 0 but why should I set admittance matrix to be 0?


EDIT:

Found it (think so...). We need to include only independent current sources in I matrix, so the equation system is:

Y = [ 1/R1 ]

V = [ V1 ]

I = [ I1 + E/R1 ]

Then it gives the same:

YV = I so V1/R1 = I1 + E/R1

But I would be very thankful to anyone for confirming that or providing different explanation.

\$\endgroup\$
1
\$\begingroup\$

The classic method looks like this

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

Step one Calculate Thevenin's equivalent impedance \$R_{TH}\$. Short all voltage sources and open circuit current sources.

As you can see \$R_{TH} = R1+R2 = 12\Omega\$

Step two We need to find the \$V_{TH}\$ voltage for this circuit:

schematic

simulate this circuit

$$V_{TH} = V1 + R1 \cdot I1 = 12V + 12V = 24V$$

Hence, the Thevenin equivalent circuit will look like this:

schematic

simulate this circuit

So we can find \$ V_{AB} = 24V * \frac{4\Omega}{12\Omega+4\Omega} = 6V \$ and additional \$IR_3 = \frac{6V}{4\Omega} = 1.5A\$

As for the nodal equation

The corrent equation looks like this

$$\frac{V_X}{R_2+R_3} + \frac{V_X - V1}{R_1} - I_1 = 0$$

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thank you. I found one mistake. But you didn't address my question. I know what's the correct equation for the circuit, but my problem is that by following rules of creating nodal equation system YV=I we obtain different equation. The admittance matrix must be 0 or the YV product 0, but I get something else. Could you describe what are your matrices Y, V and I for nodal analysis system? \$\endgroup\$ – 4pie0 Dec 18 '17 at 16:06
1
\$\begingroup\$

Answer given is correct. You confused the issue by including R3 in Rth but not Vth.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.