1
\$\begingroup\$

This is the datasheet of voltage regulator that I would use:

http://www.advanced-monolithic.com/pdf/ds1117.pdf

Is it possible to exchange that 22uF with an equivalent (or larger) ceramic instead of electrolytics? Cause I would use 1206 SMD components.

Also, in some websites I did find schemas with 2 capacitors on INPUT and 2 on OUPUT, on parallel, both of 22uF + 100uF.

enter image description here

In effect, I did print same pcb layout (feeded power from a Samsung Charger via MICROUSB and converted down to 3V3) with electrolytics capacitors and it works very well (tested with a multimeter, 5V on INPUT and 3V3 on output). Is it an exageration?

Thank you for both the answer

Edit: another schematic with this AMS1117 is the module provided on Aliexpress.

This is the image (mirrored...), you can read 104+106 on input and same on output.

I did test them from a friend and seems to work... What do you think about them?

On another image, seems clear that 104+106 on input and 104+106 on output. Is possible that supplier does not respect the datasheet?

enter image description here

enter image description here

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Related: Can I replace all electrolytic capacitors with ceramic ones? \$\endgroup\$ – The Photon Jan 2 '18 at 19:22
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ The 100uF is suspicious. Since that comes from some random site on the internet, it might be in error. 100nF in parallel with the 22uF would make sense. 100uF in parallel with 22uF doesn't make any sense, though. \$\endgroup\$ – JRE Jan 2 '18 at 20:47
  • \$\begingroup\$ @JRE thank you. Just find another module, with AMS1117, that use 2x capacitors (1uF and 10uF). See please my update question. Thank you! \$\endgroup\$ – sineverba Jan 2 '18 at 22:54
2
\$\begingroup\$

No, not necessarily. You can replace the electrolytic capacitor with an equivalent ceramic with a 0.33 or 0.5 ohm resistor in series. The datasheet only mentions tantalum capacitors and you should take that as an enormous red flag. Too-low ESR means that the regulator could be unstable or only conditionally stable (could oscillate under different load or temperature conditions).

Note that a 22uF ceramic may not be equivalent to a 22uF electrolytic. Especially for smaller types run close to their rated voltage the capacitance can be much less than the marked value. Always check the capacitance vs. voltage curve for the proposed part.

| improve this answer | |
\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Ok, I will follow the electrolytics way. Thank you very much! \$\endgroup\$ – sineverba Jan 2 '18 at 19:44
  • \$\begingroup\$ Just find another module, with AMS1117, that use 2x capacitors (1uF and 10uF). See please my update question. Thank you! \$\endgroup\$ – sineverba Jan 2 '18 at 22:54
  • \$\begingroup\$ Chinese products from random local companies may not be the best examples to emulate with regard to design excellence. \$\endgroup\$ – Spehro Pefhany Jan 3 '18 at 0:30
2
\$\begingroup\$

I wouldn't risk it.

The datasheet you linked specifically recommends a tantalum electrolytic and says that the capacitor is critical for maintaining control stability. It's very common for older regulator designs like AMS1117 to require a minimum ESR in the output capacitor for stability, and for ceramic capacitors to have too low an ESR for this. The datasheets often don't mention this requirement because ceramic capacitors in the 10 uF and higher range simply weren't available when the datasheets were written.

The TI replacement part (LM1117) specifically requires an ESR between 0.3 and 22 ohms, but the requirements for the version from your vendor may be different.

You could consider using a ceramic capacitor with a series resistance (either an SMT part or a narrow trace), but you'd need to test carefully to be sure this remains stable under all the operating conditions required for your application (temperature, voltage, etc), also considering the variability of the capacitance value with temperature, age, etc.

Or simply use a newer regulator design whose datasheet explicitly allows use with low-ESR ceramic output capacitors.

| improve this answer | |
\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ OK... I will remain with electrolytics capacitors. Thank you in advance, what about my second question (2 capacitors on input 2 on output?) \$\endgroup\$ – sineverba Jan 2 '18 at 19:43
  • \$\begingroup\$ Generally adding capacitors to the output will improve load regulation. But I don't see what you're asking specifically; all you asked is "Is it an exageration?" but I don't know what you're referring to or why you think it might be an exaggeration. \$\endgroup\$ – The Photon Jan 2 '18 at 19:46
  • \$\begingroup\$ I'm referring to the double capacitors on input and output. Btw, I did update the question with another module just find on internet and tested from a friend of mine. What do you think? \$\endgroup\$ – sineverba Jan 2 '18 at 22:56
  • \$\begingroup\$ But why do you think it's an exaggeration? How does that even make sense? (Exaggeration means you say something is more extreme than it actually is like "your car is as big as a yacht") \$\endgroup\$ – The Photon Jan 2 '18 at 22:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.