-1
\$\begingroup\$

Why are the 2 outputs of SR flipflop using nor gates considered to be Q and Q'? If we consider them Q and P for eg. The configuration S=1 and R=1 would be valid. So why are they considered complimentary of each other. They are clearly not complimentary since one configuration does not match the truth table of negation

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ The outputs are complementary except in the sole "illegal input" case (out of four possible), which you are supposed to avoid using anyway. \$\endgroup\$ – jonk Feb 1 '18 at 6:00
  • \$\begingroup\$ @jonk so today i will write some random circuit which evaluates to A xor B except for 1 case. So i say that case is illegal and my circuit is XOR gate. This is so illogical! \$\endgroup\$ – Ishan Srivastava Feb 1 '18 at 7:34
1
\$\begingroup\$

Except in the case where S = R = 1, the two outputs are opposite. That's why we say the two outputs are Q and Q'. The question then becomes "why is S = R = 1 illegal?"

SR Latch with NOR gates

The picture above shows a NOR SR latch with S = R = 1. Notice how the outputs are both 0 since 1 NOR anything = 0 (the program I am using is Logisim, by the way). If I then set the inputs back to the quiescent state where S = R = 0 (which is supposed to keep the state of the latch since 0 NOR x means the output depends SOLELY on x (0 NOR 0 = 1, 0 NOR 1 = 0, where the first 0 does not give us enough information to determine the output the same way 1 NOR x does)). X in this case is the output of the other NOR gate, so if the two inputs S and R are both 0, they do not affect the outputs, thus the state is "latched."

Anyway, when S = R = 1, A and B (top and bottom outputs) are both 0. What would happen if we switch S and R back to 0? A then becomes 0 NOR B, but remember that B was 0 before we change S and R back to being 0, so A = 0 NOR B = 0 NOR 0 = 1, and B = 0 NOR A = 0 NOR 1 = 0.

But, what would happen if B switched first? Then, B = 0 NOR A = 0 NOR 0 = 1, and A = 0 NOR B = 0 NOR 1 = 0.

The point is that, depending on which output changes first, we can not tell whether A = 1 and B = 0 or if A = 0 and B = 1. It depends on which output, A or B, changes first, and if we reset S and R back to 0 at the same time, it is completely random.

That's why S = R = 1 is illegal in a NOR SR latch, which is why, for all legal inputs, A and B are inverses, or as you'll see it, A = Q and B = Q'.

EDIT: For the sake of completion, I included pictures of all other states:

Set

Quiescent (or quiet) state

Reset

\$\endgroup\$
0
0
\$\begingroup\$

The outputs Q and Q' are complementary of each other as long as the configuration S=R=1 is not allowed. This is called a forbidden state as both NOR gates output zeros. This negates the logical equation Q=Q'. Therefore this state is not allowed.

So for a NOR SR latch the outputs are complementary to each other as long as the forbidden state S=R=1 is not considered.

enter image description here

Now there is another problem with this forbidden state that makes it even more inappropriate in circuits. When a forbidden to hold transition takes place due to a problem known as race condition the output Q may lock to either 1 or 0, depending on the propagation delays between the gates. So that is one more reason to avoid this situation even if you may be interested in this configuration.

There are some solutions to overcome this problem occurring with SR latch. One is to consider a JK flip flop in which the configuration (J,K)=(1,1) is no longer restricted. There are still other solutions to convert this restricted state to a non-restricted state which I leave it to you as an exercise.

\$\endgroup\$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.