1
\$\begingroup\$

Regarding the collector current Ic equation in the below figure:

enter image description here

The above figure tells:

Ic = Is * (exp(Vbe/Ut)-1)

But I thought it should be:

Ic = α * Is * (exp(Vbe/Ut)-1) + Icbo

1-) Is α and Icbo neglected in the figure?

2-) Is the reverse saturation current Is the reverse saturation current between the base-emitter junction? Is Is that the same thing called Ieo in some texts?

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ I'm not familiar with \$I_{EO}\$, itself. Is it just another name for \$I_{EBO}\$? In any case, I recommend studying Level 1 BJT Model. Pretty much all the details are there for you. (I am assuming you mean 'area' when you write \$a\$. You will see that term in the above document.) I find plotting these things on a log chart helps a great deal in understanding the factors, though. For example, \$I_S\$ is just what you get at the y-axis when you apply a ruler to the flat part in region II curve of the BJT operating mode. \$\endgroup\$ – jonk Feb 10 '18 at 18:18
  • \$\begingroup\$ No that is alpha \$\endgroup\$ – floppy380 Feb 10 '18 at 18:27
  • \$\begingroup\$ Okay. Then I recommend reading the document I gave you. All answers are in there and detailed well. Start with the section on DC operation. \$\endgroup\$ – jonk Feb 10 '18 at 18:45
  • \$\begingroup\$ In that document there is not a single term called "reverse saturation current" The terminology is horrible. \$\endgroup\$ – floppy380 Feb 10 '18 at 18:47
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Sorry, then. I started to consider what I wanted to write about this, because what you wrote isn't consistent with the way I think of things. This means we'd be at cross-purposes until we'd established mutual foundations we understood and agreed to share. And then we could move forward. Then I just gave up. Too much work establishing terms. I apologize for my lack of energy. \$\endgroup\$ – jonk Feb 10 '18 at 19:04
4
\$\begingroup\$

As per Ebers–Moll Model of an NPN transistor:

$$I_E = I_{ES} (e^{V_{BE}/V_T} -1) -\alpha_RI_{CS}(e^{V_{BC}/V_T}-1)$$ $$I_C = \alpha_FI_{ES} (e^{V_{BE}/V_T} -1) -I_{CS}(e^{V_{BC}/V_T}-1)$$ where:

\$ I_{ES}\$ = reverse saturation current of Base-Emitter Junction.

\$ \alpha_R\$ = reverse current gain

\$ \alpha_F\$ = foward current gain

\$ I_{CS}\$ = reverse saturation current of Base-Collector Junction.

Approximated Ebers-Moll Models look like: $$I_E \approx I_{ES} (e^{V_{BE}/V_T} -1) $$ $$I_C \approx \alpha_FI_{ES} (e^{V_{BE}/V_T} -1) $$ which satisfies the normal convention: \$ I_C = \alpha_F I_E \$

Therefore, whatever source you took the figure from, By \$ I_S \$ they mean, \$ \alpha_F I_{ES} \$.

If you are looking for where is \$ I_{CBO} \$, it is there in the original equation of \$ I_C \$ , the term --> \$-I_{CS}(e^{V_{BC}/V_T}-1) \$ is nothing but equals to \$ + I_{CBO}\$.

From the original Ebers-Moll Model equations, you can see that even \$ I_C = \alpha_F I_E + I_{CBO} \$ is an approximation, as it neglects the second term in the expression for \$I_E\$.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.