2
\$\begingroup\$

I'm studying the following circuit with a MOSFET

enter image description here

Now for analyzing this circuit, my book came out with various equations (which I totally understand and have no doubts about it).

Because the gate current is zero we have:

(1) $$V_G=V_{DD} \frac{R_2}{R_1+R_2}$$

Assuming the MOSFET is working on saturation we also have:

(2) $$I_D=k(V_{GS}-V_t)^2$$

And applying KVL:

(3) $$V_{GS}=V_G-R_SI_D$$

Substituting equation (3) on equation (2) we have:

(4) $$I_D=k(V_G-R_SI_D -V_t)^2$$

Now comes to the point I'm not understanding. To show us the dependence of the drain current over the threshold voltage, the book takes the derivative of the expression:

(5) $$\frac{dI_D}{dV_t}=\frac{d}{dV_t}k(V_G-R_SI_D -V_t)^2$$

and then it writes:

(6) $$\frac{dI_D}{dV_t}=\frac{-2\sqrt{kI_D}}{1+2R_S\sqrt{kI_D}}$$

How on earth did they go from equation (5) to equation (6) by taking the derivative? What kind of substitution are they making?

\$\endgroup\$
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Granger - Hi, (a) Since you referred to the equations by number, I've added numbers to each of them, to make it easier for readers. :-) I hope I've numbered them as you intended; if not, please correct the numbering. (b) Please can you add a reference to the book which you mention (title, author, page number etc.). Thanks. \$\endgroup\$ – SamGibson Feb 14 '18 at 2:11
  • \$\begingroup\$ differentiate 5 then sub 2 for Vt into result \$\endgroup\$ – Sunnyskyguy EE75 Feb 14 '18 at 4:35
  • \$\begingroup\$ 6 is the derivative of 4 (I didn't verify this). 5 is saying that "dId/dVt is the derivative of this thing" but without actually having worked out the derivative. \$\endgroup\$ – immibis Feb 14 '18 at 4:40
  • \$\begingroup\$ looks ok to me. \$\endgroup\$ – Sunnyskyguy EE75 Feb 14 '18 at 4:43
  • \$\begingroup\$ I obtained $$-2k(V_G -R_SI_D-V_{GS}+ \sqrt{\frac{I_D}{k}})$$. What should I do next? \$\endgroup\$ – Granger Obliviate Feb 14 '18 at 11:15
2
\$\begingroup\$

$$\frac{dI_D}{dV_t}=\frac{d}{dV_t}k(V_G-R_SI_D -V_t)^2$$ $$\implies \frac{dI_D}{dV_t} = 2k(V_G-R_SI_D -V_t)(0-R_S\frac{dI_D}{dV_t}-1)$$ $$\implies \frac{dI_D}{dV_t} = 2k(V_G-R_SI_D -V_t)(0-R_S\frac{dI_D}{dV_t}-1) ---(1)$$ Given that: $$I_D=k(V_G-R_SI_D -V_t)^2$$ $$\implies (V_G-R_SI_D -V_t) = \sqrt{I_D/k} $$ Therefore (1) \$ \implies\$ $$\frac{dI_D}{dV_t} = 2\sqrt{kI_D}(-R_S\frac{dI_D}{dV_t} -1)$$ $$\implies \frac{dI_D}{dV_t} +2\sqrt{kI_D}R_S\frac{dI_D}{dV_t} = -2\sqrt{kI_D} $$ $$\implies\frac{dI_D}{dV_t}(1+2\sqrt{kI_D}R_S) = -2\sqrt{kI_D} $$ $$\implies \frac{dI_D}{dV_t} =\frac{-2\sqrt{kI_D}}{1+2R_S\sqrt{kI_D}} $$

\$\endgroup\$
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Thank you very much! I got what I was doing wrong. I was assuming a constant current I_S, which is obviously wrong. \$\endgroup\$ – Granger Obliviate Feb 14 '18 at 14:06
  • \$\begingroup\$ Yes Id is a dependent variable on Vt. \$\endgroup\$ – Mitu Raj Feb 14 '18 at 14:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.