So I'm reading up on MPP, and I don't get it.
Let's say there's solar panel, now there's flow of electrons from solar panel, correct? That's how you get so-called "power" into the battery, right?
I don't get what's the point of Boost converter, if you just simply need to hook solar panel to battery, why does it not give maximum power point?
The so-called "explanation" is that current varies non-linearly to voltage? Some kind of IV curves, and how you need to change voltage to get MPP.
I don't get all that? Like, why?
Formula for power can be written as:
\$ P = i^2 \cdot R \$?
doesn't matter what voltage is! Just make R as big as you can, and voila! You've got the maximum power point! Why doesn't it work that way?
So R, I guess is the load, right?
I looked at circuit diagrams for solar panels, inverter and battery. And I don't quite understand why they draw solar panel as "voltage source", this is false.
In reality, you have flow of electrons from solar panel, so it's more accurate to draw current source, not voltage source... Right?
So for simplicity sake, here's circuit:
I1 is current from solar panel, say it's 50 mA, so in order to maximize charging of battery, R1 must have maximum voltage across it, correct?
Since R1 and Battery are in parallel, so they both will have same voltage.
\$ V_{R1} = i \cdot R1 \$
In the example shown, \$ V_{R1} = 50mA \cdot 1000Ω = 50V \$
And same with power coming out from resistor? \$P = i^2 \cdot R1\$
So obviously, I should just make resistor as big as I can to get maximum \$V_{R1}\$, and thus power! What's wrong with this thinking?
The only way this won't work, is if current somehow drops if you increase resistance... but why would it? ... I don't think current coming out solar panel would care... the flow of electrons just gonna keep flowing into load... no matter load's resistance... right?