We have a circuit that has a 6V input for charging. We want to protect the device from ESD on the input, but have some discussion on where to place a resistor. The two differences we are looking at are below.

In the first case, we have the argument that the series resistor will slow the input charge somewhat, making life easier for the ESD diode and thus making it more effective.

In the seconds case, we have the argument that the ESD diode is left alone to do its job, and the series resistor can help absorb whatever the ESD diode doesn't handle.

Is there a common practice where to put the resistor and if so, why?

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

schematic

simulate this circuit

up vote 3 down vote accepted

The series resistor indeed does "slow down" the ESD pulse but that's not the complete story. The function of a series resistor is also to dissipate the energy of the ESD pulse and also limit the current. Limiting that current can make the ESD pulse longer which is good as the pulse will be "less intense" (longer in time at a smaller current) and therefore easier to handle by the ESD diode. For this, the first solution is the best.

The second solution is worse as a severe ESD pulse can break the diode as there is no extra series resistor to lower the current. Also here the resistor relies on the ESD protection present in U1.

Another/additional solution for this charging input, provided it will only be used for DC, is to add a capacitor. For example in parallel with D1 you could place an (electrolytic) capacitor of 1 uF to 10 uF or any other value you have available. In combination with the first circuit (diode at the left) that would really slow down the ESD pulse and provide very good protection.

  • Thank you for your excellent answer! Is the choice of electrolytic capacitor due to higher voltage ratings? Can we use ceramic capacitor, or are they 'useless' for this? – user2735120 Mar 7 at 14:37
  • You can just use the voltage rating for the maximum DC voltage, meaning that 6 V. I'd use some margin so I would use a 10 V or 16 V rated capacitor. A ceramic capacitor can also be used. I suggested an electrolytic as these have a higher value which lowers the RC time constant so slowing down the ESD pulse even more. – Bimpelrekkie Mar 7 at 14:42
  • @Bimpelrekkie: Electrolytic capacitors have a much higher inductance then ceramic capacitors. ESD pulses have a lot of high frequency components in them For ESD protection I would not use electrolytic capacitors. – Oldfart Mar 7 at 15:15
  • @oldfart I would agree with "most electrolytic capacitors have a higher inductance than most ceramic capacitors". I am sure there are certain models of electrolytic capacitors which have less inductance than certain ceramic capacitors. Also the actual value of the capacitor matters. Some very small SMD ceramic "chip" capacitors can have quite significant inductance. Also I am unsure how much inductance is OK to have, I would have to investigate (simulate) how much inductance would be acceptable. – Bimpelrekkie Mar 7 at 16:59

Your Answer

 

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.