1
\$\begingroup\$

I'm considering on creepage distances on my PCB. I have read UL840,there are two significant tables. 6.1 "Minimum acceptable creepage distances" and 6.2 "Minimum acceptable creepage distances on printed wiring boards". I have read post: Trace width and clearance calculations. I noticed that Dave Tweed recommends to use 6.2 table. But in table 6.1 there is a sentence: "Creepage distances for equipment subject to long-term stress". I'm considering what does it mean, and when i should use values from table 6.1?

\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

The difference between 6.1 and 6.2 is based on the continuous voltage differential between the traces.

For example: If you expect a continuous 1000V between two traces, it should be spaced according to 6.1.

If you only need to be able to withstand a 1000V surge infrequently and/or for brief periods of time, then the spacing can be according to 6.2.

| improve this answer | |
\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ I was thinking the same, but now i have new consideration. I design 27V circuit and creepage valu for this voltge from 6.1 is 0,53 mm. But on my PCB i have INA138NA/250 in SOT-23. Pin gnd and pin Vin are next to each other and the spacing beetwen them is 0,45 mm. I should think about milling? \$\endgroup\$ – M.Kruk Mar 21 '18 at 10:22
  • \$\begingroup\$ What pollution levels are you expecting? You may not need to include spacing for level 2 if you don't expect level 2. If you read note Z of table 1, it mentions that under 32V there isn't risk of tracking, simply corrosion. I wouldn't be too concerned with the spacing at 27V, its fairly low and the component is clearly designed for it. \$\endgroup\$ – Redja Mar 22 '18 at 18:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.