I want to buy a survey grade single frequency L1 GPS/GLONASS/BeiDou/Galileo GNSS antenna (survey antennas have a ground plane built in). I found a product that specifies it is a GPS/GLONASS/BeiDou multi-frequency (L1, L2 etc.) antenna but it does not list Galileo. The Galileo E1 signal (called L1 earlier, I hope it is the first/main signal) has the same center frequency as GPS L1 (1575 MHz). Will the antenna be able to receive Galileo E1?

The L1 vs E1 signal bandwidth for GPS vs Galileo may differ a little bit but I am not sure if that can be an issue.

Here are some references:

  • \$\begingroup\$ What do you think is the additional thing the antenna cares about other than frequency? \$\endgroup\$
    – PlasmaHH
    Commented Apr 4, 2018 at 11:39
  • \$\begingroup\$ The bandwidth for instance? I have no idea how precisely the bandwidth requirement is met for the antenna though. \$\endgroup\$
    – Kozuch
    Commented Apr 4, 2018 at 12:06

1 Answer 1


In my practical experience, yes it does work that way, the Galileo does "take a free ride" as far as GPS L1 antennas are concerned. (The receiver is a different story of course, because the modulation and coding schemes are different.)

A good GPS antenna contains a ceramic filter for "out of band rejection" that's typically about 60 MHz wide and pretty steep. A single stage ceramic filter has about -50 dB suppression outside its passband. I've seen antennas containing a cascade of two filters to achieve about -70 dB "out of band suppression".

Navipedia has some nice GNSS frequency plans / diagrams for GPS, Galileo, GLONASS and BeiDou.

A GPS antenna should work for Galileo in terms of signal levels too (amplitude and gain). To be more specific, I believe the signal levels at antenna "driven element feed point" are in the ballpark of -130 to -160 dBmW, which means that a couple dozen extra satellites (Galileo) won't overload the preamp and intermodulation is practically not a factor either.

Note that this compatibility probably works for "direct amplified" L1 antennas only. In contrast, antennas containing a down-converter (mixer) are likely to contain a narrower filter in the IF stage. But, such antenna downlink systems are proprietary and will be vendor-locked to a particular receiver. Thus, it's ultimately a matter of the receiver anyway, if Galileo is supported or not... I guess I know one such proprietary system where the receiver (demodulator) really decodes the GPS L1 C/A code only, and therefore probably only needs about +/- 2 MHz from the center frequency, out of the rather complex GPS L1 spectrum that encompasses more like +/- 20 MHz. Those receivers are niche timing stuff, really - with long coax antenna downlinks. Not sure how the modern, highly integrated positioning receivers are constructed, if they work with analog IF downconversion at all, or if the front end uses direct carrier sampling and discrete time down-conversion, hinging on artful abuse of Nyquistian aliasing... (wifi style)

==== EDIT ====

oops, you've included the signal plans already, apologies for stating the obvious then :-)

  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks for a great answer! Will Galileo E5 take a free ride on this particular antenna the same way as E1? \$\endgroup\$
    – Kozuch
    Commented Apr 8, 2018 at 2:35
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Based on the information provided on the product page I cannot give you a definitive answer, but chances are, that E5 will work too. In the "signal plans" that we both refer to, note that the various "L2" bands for the other systems are lower than the Galileo E5. BeiDou B3 is the closest, bordering on E5. The parameter table on the antenna product page does mention B3 with a slightly lower gain. The table does not mention "out of band rejection" - means to me that the antenna doesn't contain steep filters. The dual-band radiator will have two somewhat broad maxima, for L1 and "L2". \$\endgroup\$
    – frr
    Commented Apr 8, 2018 at 18:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.