This is a fundamental theoretical question about power and efficiency of AC voltage source with very low output impedance, for example, a DC-AC converter; H-bridge converter or class E amplifier.

MY question is:

Does the source impedance of DC-AC converter always represent losses?

To further elaborate the question,

Let's assume the converter to be a pure sinusoidal source with a source impedance of Rs follows. I understand that the source impedance can be a time varying quantity but for the time being, lets assume an equivalent source impedance to be Rs fro a given operating condition.


simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

With this representation, we know when Rs=RL, the maximum power is delivered to the load, and the efficiency become 50%.

My question here is that in actual implementations of such power electronic converter, when the load is optimized to deliver maximum power, is the efficiency always limited to 50%? If not, how it can be explained? Or in other words, Does the source impedance of DC-AC converter always corresponds to losses? I feel I am missing something here.

To elaborate this further,

If now we consider, for example, a class E converter, we know the theoretical maximum efficiency is 100%, in practical implementations, it can easily be above 90%. But highest efficiency is achieved not at the impedance matched condition and I understand that it is not a usual practice to operate at matched condition for such scenario, however, this is for theoretical understanding of such operating condition.

For example, the following figure is from this IEEE paper, efficiency doesn't seem to be less than 50% when the maximum power is delivered to the load.

enter image description here enter image description here

Additional explanation:

Even if we assume load resistance is not a fixed value (it can be a variable w.r.t with load, and also, it can be a time varying quantity depending on switching transients) we can consider an equivalent source impedance when the output power is maximum. For example, in the above paper, lets approximate power is maximized at 4.5ohm (say, power is maximized when the normalized resistance is around 0.5 in the above graph), then we can deduce that the source impedance seen by the load is close to 4.5ohm. If we consider only this particular operating point, what represents this source impedance (I stress, it can be an equivalent one, or, may even be a time averaged one)?

In adiition, if we can agree that the source impedance is close to 4.5ohm then does the source incur losses corresponding to a 4.5ohm? Then, as the answer by @Neil_UK suggests, should the efficiency be always less then 50% at maximum power delivery condition?

I used this particular reference and numbers to clarify the question. My question is not necessarily limited to this particular converter or class E topology. It is a general to DC-AC converters. I could not find any good reference which discusses this issue?

Or, in another way, is it completely incorrect trying to model a low impedance DC/AC converter (assuming high Q, and load current is fairly sinusoidal) with this model.

  • 5
    \$\begingroup\$ I don't think your simplification of choosing a fixed source impedance and a matching load impedance is valid for any real world system. Since they are regulated they try to behave like 0Ω source impedance systems. \$\endgroup\$
    – PlasmaHH
    Apr 19, 2018 at 8:04
  • \$\begingroup\$ @PlasmaHH , Thanks, I agree that the source impedance is not fixed. But if we only consider the maximum power delivery condition, output impedance of converter is matched with the load. Then what represents this source impedance? doesn't it cause considerable energy loss (50% or close to that)? \$\endgroup\$
    – Pojj
    Apr 19, 2018 at 8:59
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ This paper isn't talking about DC to AC inverters, it's talking about RF amplifiers (unless you rather perversely consider an amplifier to be sort of DC power to AC signal converter). Matching of output impedance to transmission line impedance is far more important at RF frequencies than at the ones power inverters normally run at. \$\endgroup\$
    – Finbarr
    Apr 19, 2018 at 9:48
  • \$\begingroup\$ I am referring to any DC-AC converter in general, I believe, Class E converter/amplifier at low frequencies can also be within this category. This particular circuit in the paper operates around 190kHz. \$\endgroup\$
    – Pojj
    Apr 19, 2018 at 10:08
  • \$\begingroup\$ @PlasmaHH, I tried to further explain my question. \$\endgroup\$
    – Pojj
    Apr 20, 2018 at 8:44

2 Answers 2


It depends what power you choose to deliver from your source.

If you choose to deliver the maximum possible by varying the load impedance to be equal to the source output impedance, then yes, your efficiency is limited to 50%.

If instead you choose to deliver much less than this maximum power, your efficiency can approach 100%.

Consider a 200v source, with a 0.1ohm output impedance. This might be a reasonable model of a mid-sized DC-AC converter.

If you choose to try to extract maximum possible power by running it into a 0.1ohm load, then 200v into 0.2ohms gives you a load current of 1000A, with 100v into the load, delivering 100kW at 50% efficiency.

However, I did say this was a mid-sized converter, perhaps 2kW rated power, it's not going to handle 1000A output current, even though it does have a low output impedance. At 2kW, 200v, we would be running 10A load current. 10A in the output impedance of 0.1 ohm would drop 1v, so the efficiency due to the output impedance alone is around than 99.5%.

Just because a converter has a low output impedance doesn't mean it's capable of delivering the matched load maximum power output.

  • \$\begingroup\$ I tried to further explain the question. In my example, output power is maximized around 4.5ohm. So is it legitimate to assume source impedance is close 4.5 ohm in this case? \$\endgroup\$
    – Pojj
    Apr 20, 2018 at 8:47
  • \$\begingroup\$ With respect to your example, if we assume source resistance to be constant at 0.1ohm, then the power should be increasing with decreasing load resistance. Or, will the equivalent source resistance increases with the decrease of the load? In this way, usually, I think, the load at which the maximum power is delivered can be within the maximum power rating of the converter. My question was to understand the analogy and the validity of this equivalent circuit. Is there any good reference that discusses this approach? \$\endgroup\$
    – Pojj
    Apr 20, 2018 at 9:06

Maximum power transfer occurs when Zs = Zl*, but that is not in general the maximum efficiency point, and may not be an operating point that the supply is even capable of. There is also the implicit assumption that the supply looks like a pure impedance, they seldom really do.

Usually one designs sources to have either very low (voltage source) or very high (current source) output impedance even if driving into say a 50 ohm load, the restrictions on the load value having more to do with keeping the amplifier inside its safe operating area and linear region (if appropriate).

The matched impedance thing makes sense when you have a source that implicitly has an impedance that is not either close to zero of very high, say if you were using an aerial that is transforming the 377 ohms of free space to something lower, or something with a non negligible transmission line where the impedance looking into the line matters.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Thank you for your answer. It made me to ask my question clearer. In this question, I am interested in voltage sources with very low (yet non-zero) output impedance. I agree that it is not usual practice to operate at matched condition with such sources. But, in theory, if we assume that we operate at matched condition, then should the efficiency be less than 50%? Or in other words, does this source impedance always corresponds to losses? \$\endgroup\$
    – Pojj
    Apr 20, 2018 at 13:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.