While I was studying for my exam I saw this question where he's given me a bunch of ADCs asking me which would work and which wouldn't He's given me the Minimum required Precision for the ADC and I don't really know what to do with it, to convert it into a value that I can compare it with something else • The number of bits will help give you the resolution of the adc. The sample rate is also going to be a big deal for two of them (only sampling about twice during the input waveform...) Apr 20 '18 at 15:51
• I suppose that the ADC is intended to be bipolar, in which case think about how many bits of signal you will get. Apr 20 '18 at 15:52
• I get that ,The problem is with the precision I literally don't know what to do with it @ChadG Apr 20 '18 at 15:53
• Precision is a difficult one to answer without knowledge of the particular ADC characteristics (eg: nonlinearity, jitter). Is your instructor expecting you to infer this from ADC type? Perhaps they've tossed out some typical figures in a slide somewhere? That would be an error on your instructor's part - properly designed, all of those architectures can achieve better than 4% precision - but I've seen worse in higher education. Apr 20 '18 at 16:19
• @PeterK "Is your instructor expecting you to infer this from ADC type" I think that's what he was expecting, Can you spare some time to explain what are the variables that I need in order to calculate the Precision % of an adc Apr 20 '18 at 16:56

For resolution and accuracy defined by %x the Vref does not matter as the signal may be scaled from +/-10V to match Vref for bipolar and Vref/2 for unipolar.

Sampling rate must be > 2x fmax. This rules out (1),(2) next (3),4) at 1kHz

For sampling rate fs= 1kHz and fmax-478Hz fmax/fs = 0.478

• attenuation at 478 Hz must be <4% = -28dB
• or >0.96 of flat response or 0.35dB error in passband
• and bandstop at 1/2 of fs must be > -28dB for 4% accuracy Since 500Hz/478 = 1.046 the stop band is >-28dB @ 500Hz with < -0.35dB at 478Hz which is possible a 10th order filter.

Yet the resolution needed is 1% or 100:1 and 7 bit has a quantization error of 1/128 makes it possible yet harder to design a brick wall filter that has no group delay at 0.96 of the f-3dB breakpoint unless you have more resolution.

That rules out (4) as practical

But with extra resolution , of 9 bits then allowance for filter accuracy with have an N order LPF to reject aliasing noise that affects accuracy.

This so-called Nyquist filter may have a Bessel Filter for a maximally group delay or a linear phase response to say -12dB so that signals at fmax are not distorted by phase. In order to reject the alias below x% the filter order N must be such that at N*-3dB per half octave.

• An octave is 2f or 20log2=6dB/oct per order
• And this is 500/478Hz= 1.046 f is 4.6% of an octave implying something on the order of 1/0.046 = a 20th order filter ballpark or better with FIR methods.

This makes (3) the only possible but not easy solution.

• I thought you could not use an FIR filter for anti-aliasing since they, themselves, discretely sample their input and therefore can suffer from aliasing themselves? Feb 21 '19 at 23:30
• I believe but have not done it is possible with oversampling perhaps not here Feb 22 '19 at 1:30

Sampling at less than twice the highest frequency will cause aliasing therefore 1 and 2 can be discounted. The signal has a peak amplitude of 10 volts and this means that the remaining ADC that should successfully work is item 4 because it has a Vref of 10 volts.

Having said that I've come across ADC's whose maximum range is twice the ADC reference voltage.

Also, because the input signal falls below 0 volts you have to assume that the ADC can handle fully bipolar signal inputs.

• The question is "He's given me the Minimum required Precision for the ADC and I don't really know what to do with it"
– pipe
Apr 20 '18 at 16:32
• @pipe Yep, and as I noted above, I think this is a case of the prof having an implicit, likely outdated assumption (perhaps shared in a slide) about precision of various ADC architectures. Apr 20 '18 at 16:34
• @pipe well, the only one that can meet the precision is item 4 as implied in my answer (because it can handle the peak of 10 volts). Apr 20 '18 at 17:11
• Yup. The ones that handle more than reference are usually ramp type, so maybe OP is missing some vital information. Apr 20 '18 at 17:33
• Not to mention the implied (but not stated) existence of a very good brickwall filter. Apr 20 '18 at 18:30

I want to add some information as per my experience.

As you need the minimum resolution of 1% which can only be achieved by using the 1st option with 10bit. Now as per the nyquist criteria to prevent aliasing of sampled signal your sampling frequency is less than the twice of signal frequency.

So I would suggest you to use the 4th option which is SAR ADC by which you can achieve the required sampling freqency. But as the 4th option has lower bit i.e 7 bit which can you you the resolution of 7.8%. Now to achieve the higher resolution you need to do the oversampling and averaging.

Which means you have to take more samples at the same point and then average them.

• 10bits is 1024, i.e. 0.1%. All of them are capable of 1% Jan 22 '19 at 6:51
• I think you mean 0.78%, not 7.8% Feb 21 '19 at 23:34