1
\$\begingroup\$

I have been studying VLSI Design and cannot seem to find the difference between the two adder circuits below. Both implement the functionality of a full adder with Generate, propagate and kill conditions. Can anyone point out the difference? Direct Implementation of full adder in Static CMOS style CMOS Full Adder circuit.

\$\endgroup\$
0

1 Answer 1

1
\$\begingroup\$

They are functionally identical. The only difference is in where the series-connected P-channel devices are connected at the top.

( Sorry, I'm on a touch screen device, and I can't mark up your figures.)

Note that on the upper left in the first diagram, the two series-connected devices for A and B are connected to the node with the parallel devices for A and B, which are then connected to Vdd.

In the second diagram, the same series string is connected directly to Vdd.

The same thing happens on the upper right with the series-connected string for A, B and Ci. In both cases, these connections are functionally identical (work out the truth table if you're not sure). It probably has something to do with optimizing the layout on the die.

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • \$\begingroup\$ Does it also have to do something with the fact that series pMOS transistors have a large resistance and cause more delay? \$\endgroup\$
    – hacker804
    May 18, 2018 at 17:33
  • \$\begingroup\$ Possibly. But then why would the first variation exist at all? \$\endgroup\$
    – Dave Tweed
    May 18, 2018 at 17:46
  • \$\begingroup\$ Because it is a direct static CMOS implementation created using a PDN and a complementary PUN whereas the second one is a modified and more optimized version. \$\endgroup\$
    – hacker804
    May 19, 2018 at 2:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.