0
\$\begingroup\$

I'm just curious if it's possible to power 2 devices at different voltages with a set of batteries while making sure that the 2 devices makes use of all the batteries. I have here an illustration of the connection that I would like to get verified. Each battery is rated ***n*** volts

Each battery is rated n volts

I used dashed lines in 2n volts connection for ease of seeing. I want to power each device with 4n volts and 2n voltsAn Alternative Illustration

An Alternative Illustration^

The solution that I propose is to connect 4 batteries in series first to power 1 device. Then since there can be 2 sets of batteries in series already I can connect these sets in parallel for the Voltage to not add up. However, just by looking at the circuit I think some portions are actually shorted.

Any help would be appreciated. Please don't be harsh if this is a dumb question.

|improve this question
\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Can you draw batteries in a straight chain, it's so difficult to imagine what you have drawn. \$\endgroup\$ – Long Pham Jun 1 '18 at 3:42
  • \$\begingroup\$ Yes, you can do that but batteries that power two devices will die faster. \$\endgroup\$ – Long Pham Jun 1 '18 at 3:44
  • \$\begingroup\$ @LongPham scontent.fmnl9-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.15752-9/… \$\endgroup\$ – Elcid Villegas Jun 1 '18 at 3:54
  • \$\begingroup\$ I have done it. My bad \$\endgroup\$ – Elcid Villegas Jun 1 '18 at 4:06
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ :( It still looks awful. \$\endgroup\$ – Long Pham Jun 1 '18 at 12:59
3
\$\begingroup\$

No. Your attempt to power a 4n load, and and 2n load from balanced batteries, shorts out each 2n battery.

You have two (or three) options.

a) Power the 4n load, and a 4n->2n converter to power the 2n load. This could be a linear regulator if the power level is low enough for you to not worry about the inefficiency and heat. Better though would be a buck regulator.

b) Configure the batteries as 2n, and power the 2n load, and a 2n->4n boost converter. Choose (a) or (b) depending on which load draws more power, or the convenience of having a buck or boost converter to hand.

c) Power the 2n load from a battery tap, and tolerate the consequences of the imbalance (replacing batteries earlier, or charging differently)

d) Power the 2n load from a switchable battery tap, so you spend 50% of the time powered from the 'top' batteries, and 50% of the time from the 'bottom' ones. Obviously you cannot common the grounds if using it like this.

e) Use a 2n set and a 4n set of batteries. You need more batteries, but get complete freedom.

Ok, so 5 options.

|improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
-1
\$\begingroup\$

Wouldn't adding a pair of diodes solve the issue? If the current isn't something massive I think it would be fine no?Professional drawing

|improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ no <+ extra letters to make up the comment length> \$\endgroup\$ – Neil_UK Jun 1 '18 at 12:50
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Neil_UK how so? \$\endgroup\$ – Elcid Villegas Jun 2 '18 at 7:56
  • \$\begingroup\$ Hello Red, and welcome. If you don't describe the issue, we cannot answer to your question. \$\endgroup\$ – Daniele Tampieri Jun 11 '18 at 7:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.