4
\$\begingroup\$

I am being asked to find the output resistance of following BJT cascode amplifier, from "Microelectronic Circuits" by Sedra and Smith, 7th edition, problem 8.80.a on page 588.

schematic

Now I decided to simplify the circuit down using the convention of opening the current sources and shorting the dc voltages to ground. Afterwards, I used the equivalent T-model to find the output resistance. I utilized the fact that the output resistance of Q1 is r_o already. Therefore, to find Ro my circuit would simplify to the following:

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

Here is my analysis \begin{equation} \\KVL\quad outer\quad loop\\ v_o=r_o\left(i_o+g_mv_{\pi }\right)+r_oi_1\\ now\quad i_o+g_mv_{\pi }=i_1+i_e\\i_e=\frac{g_mv_{\pi \:}}{\alpha }\\therefore\quad i_1=i_o-\frac{g_mv_{\pi \:\:}}{\beta }\\now\quad substituting\quad v_o=2r_oi_o+r_og_mv_{\pi \:}\left(1-\frac{1}{\beta }\:\right) \end{equation} Here utilizing the outer loop of ro and re, we get: \begin{equation} v_{\pi }=r_oi_1\\v_{\pi }=r_o\left(i_o-\beta g_mv_{\pi }\right)\\Therefore\quad\\v_{\pi \:}=\frac{r_o}{1+r_o\beta \:g_m}i_o \end{equation} Now using these relationships and substituting, we get \begin{equation} R_o=\frac{v_o}{i_o}=2r_o+\frac{r_o^2g_m\left(\beta -1\:\right)}{\beta \left(1+\beta \:r_o\:g_m\right)} \end{equation} Here, am using the following values for the parameters: \begin{equation} V_A=5,\:\beta =100,\:I=0.1mA \end{equation} Unfortunately, am using these values and am coming up with a 100.5K ohms. I know there is something wrong with my analysis, because the answer should come out to 3.33M ohms. but I can't figure out what it is. Can somebody please point me to where the mistake is in my analysis. Thank you.

** Also, the transistors are matched, parameter values are the same for Q1 and Q2

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ There's actually something wrong with your small signal circuit. \$g_mv_{\pi}\$ must flow from emitter of Q2 all the way to collector, not from base to collector. \$\endgroup\$ – dirac16 Jun 17 '18 at 3:40
  • \$\begingroup\$ @dirac16 thank you for your comment. But this is the way my book does it. \$g_mv_{pi}\$ means the collector current. Therefore, it should only flow from the base to the collector \$\endgroup\$ – Raykh Jun 17 '18 at 3:51
3
\$\begingroup\$

The first thing you should notice is that from a small-signal preceptive point of view \$Q_1\$ \$r_{o1}\$ act just like the emitter resistance for \$Q_2\$

And the small signal mode will look like this

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

The small-signal parameters are:

\$\large g_{m2} = \frac{0.1\textrm{mA}}{25\textrm{mV}} = 4\textrm{mS}\$

\$\large r_{\pi 2} = \frac{\beta}{g_{m2}} = 25\textrm{k}\Omega\$

\$\large r_{o2} = r_{o1} = \frac{V_A}{\textrm{I}} =\frac{5 \textrm{V}}{0.1\textrm{mA}} = 50 \$

Hence the output resistance will be the same as I show here:

BJT common-base output resistance derivation

finding output resistance of CB amplifier with ro

$$R_{OUT} = \frac{V_X}{I_X} = r_{o2}+\left(1+ g_{m2} r_{o2}\right)\cdot r_{o1}||r_{\pi2} = 3.4\textrm{M}\Omega $$

Also, remember that in the small-signal analysis you can replace PNP with the NPN small-signal model.

schematic

simulate this circuit

schematic

simulate this circuit

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ thank you very much for your answer. I would like to get some clarifications. I noticed that your model seems like the hybrid-pi model since you are using the r-pi. But my confusion now is, how could r_o1 which is in the emitter of Q2 be in parallel with r_pi2 which is in the base of Q2?? \$\endgroup\$ – Raykh Jun 17 '18 at 15:01
  • \$\begingroup\$ could you please point me to where my mistake is in my analysis. I can't figure out where am going wrong?? \$\endgroup\$ – Raykh Jun 17 '18 at 15:04
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Raykh but do you see that ro||re in your small-signal? And from where did you get this 2ro? Vo = ro(Io + gm vpi)+ ro I1 is equal to Vo = ro(Io+ gm vpi + I1)also you equation for vpi is wrong. It seems that you forget that I1 = Io - (gm Vpi)/β. So vpi = (β Io ro)/(β + gm ro) \$\endgroup\$ – G36 Jun 17 '18 at 16:03
  • \$\begingroup\$ Ah! you nailed it. It is this algebra mistake for vpi. Exactly, vpi = ( Io ro)/(1 + gm ro/β ). Thank you very much. A lot of insightful information I learned. I didn't know that for small signal analysis you can replace the PNP with NPN. Thank you very much. \$\endgroup\$ – Raykh Jun 17 '18 at 17:15
  • \$\begingroup\$ given that now I know Ro and Rin for this folded cascode. Do you know a technique to find the gain Av using Ro and Rin?? or do I have to redo the small signal analysis all over again but for now to find gain?? \$\endgroup\$ – Raykh Jun 17 '18 at 17:21
0
\$\begingroup\$

i hope you did notice that in fact there are two different ro's going on in this circuit here... (I'm assuming based on context that you have VAnpn = VApnp which is really nice but I get it it's a textbook problem, ) ... so go back to the drawing board and redo your KVL's and KCL's. by the way, save yourself some time, choose KCL over KVL 99% of the time for these problems... they just end up being fewer more succinct/compact equations to solve. (personal experience)

i also suspect your small signal model for your pnp transistor should be checked... i just did a cursory inspection and I bet dirac16 is right

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ You could have saved yourself the time than giving me a "smart" answer. You're answer is irrelevant to the question and does not imply helpful information, sorry voting down. \$\endgroup\$ – Raykh Jun 17 '18 at 14:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.