0
\$\begingroup\$

Why are source and channel encodings usually performed separately? Could they be made together?

thanks!

\$\endgroup\$
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ With respect to what? Make your question specific, are you talking about ECC? \$\endgroup\$ – Voltage Spike Jul 16 '18 at 22:33
  • \$\begingroup\$ Channel codings are often dynamic such as modems and HDMI 2 with return loss calibration. So it is better to be separated. \$\endgroup\$ – Sunnyskyguy EE75 Jul 16 '18 at 23:31
2
\$\begingroup\$

One of the central results of applied information theory is that you can do them separately!

So, that's usually what you want to do: first remove as much redundancy as possible with a method that uses knowledge of the structure of the data source, and then use the output of that with a channel coder that uses as much knowledge of the nature of the channel as possible.

It's generally not desirable to combine these functionalities, but yes, of course, you could concatenate these into a new function and call it "sourcechannelcoding" or whatever. It simply won't have any advantage over considering them separately.

And that's great! It means we can optimize source and channel coding independently.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.