# Measured amperage differs greatly from my math

I've got the following circuit:

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

It works. The LED glows nice and bright.

However my math doesn't match the readings I'm getting from my digital multimeter. Using Ohm's Law, I take the voltage rating of the batteries and desired amperage of the LED to figure out how much resistance I need.

This is my math:

V = I*R = 4.8V (4x AA 1.2V/2400mA in series)
I = V/R = 0.02A (1x 3mm Green LED 3.0-3.2V/20mA)
R = V/I = 240Ω (1x 220Ω & 1x 20Ω in series)


Voltage across the batteries: 5.17V
Voltage across the LED: 2.93V
Voltage across the resistors: 2.24V
Resistance across the resistors: 238Ω
Amperage on the circuit: 9.56mA


Now obviously I am getting more volts from the batteries than I anticipated but even adjusting for that I still don't get ~9.5mA of current in my math.

V = I*R = 5.2V
I = V/R = 0.022A
R = V/I = 238Ω


What am I missing?

• Your circuit (schematic) is most definitely incorrect. The LED is backwards-biased. – Eugene Sh. Jul 19 '18 at 19:24
• And yes, V/R=2.24V/238Ohm=9.412mA. From your data. – Eugene Sh. Jul 19 '18 at 19:27
• @EugeneSh. The LED produces light so I must have built the schematic in CircuitLab incorrectly. Does the LED symbol need to point to the left? I assumed the arrow followed the electron flow. – Exide Jul 19 '18 at 19:27
• The arrow should follow the current flow. – Eugene Sh. Jul 19 '18 at 19:28
• @Exide There's a difference between conventional current and electron flow. – Daniel Jul 19 '18 at 19:30

The resistance is calculated from the voltage across the resistors, which is the battery voltage minus the LED voltage (your schematic shows the LED backwards, but obviously that's not what you've built).

Using your original numbers (4.8V-3.1V)/0.02A = 85$\Omega$

Using your measured battery voltage: (5.17-3.1)/0.02 = 103

So try 100$\Omega$.