Notice below part of electric scheme as designed by solar company:
On the left you can see inverter used - Delta Solivia 7.6 TL (see Operation and Installation Manual for details) which supports up to 4 strings of solar panels.
Legend on the right side:
- MP2 and MP3 are different roof surfaces (slopes). This is important for the whole story below: MP2 and MP3 surfaces are pointing towards different azimuths (so peaking energy production at different times of the day/ peaking voltage at different times);
You can see that the design has only two strings used (marked as "4" and "6" on the diagram):
- String "6" (the upper one) has panels from both surfaces (!) - and that's why I created this question - it seems to me a big problem right here as, again, panels on roof surfaces MP2 and MP3 peak voltage at different times of the day so that panels on MP2 and MP3 would only provide voltage of lowest ones of them !?
- String "4" has panels from surface MP2 (only) but also notice that some other solar panels from that same surface MP2 are also connected to String "6" (probably okay).
Can somebody please confirm if that's a valid concern above? I thought that was the whole selling point of microinverters (which this design doesn't have) - is that each panel can produce slightly different voltage, and so energy production can be combined efficiently. That's very strange (to say the least) that they've used panels facing different azimuths - on one string ..
This will work, but it will not be optimal. What they should have done is: use one or two strings for surface MP2 which has more panels, and a separate (third) string for surface MP3. Does this make sense?