# Termination resistors: are they needed?

For a project I'm designing, I'm using an IS42s32800 (TSOP) SDRAM with an LPC1788 (QFP) microcontroller. On the PCB I have 4 layers with a ground plane right below the top signal layer and a VDD plane right above the bottom signal layer. Average traces between the CPU and the RAM are 60 mm long with the longest trace being 97 mm, the clock line 53 mm long and no line has termination resistors mounted. What I'm curious about is whether it's absolutely necessary or not to have termination resistors on DRAM lines. Would this design work without them or should I not even bother to try it without the resistors?

If the frequency/rise time and distance is high enough to cause issues, then yes, you need termination.

### Transmission-Line Model

At 97mm longest trace I think you will probably get away without them (given results of calculations below) If you have a PCB package that handles IBIS models and board level simulation (e.g. Altium and other expensive packages), then simulate your setup and judge whether you need them from the results.

If you don't have this capability available, then you can do some rough calculations using SPICE.
I had a little mess around with LTSpice, here are the results (feel free to correct things if anyone sees an error)

If we assume:

• Your RAM input signal rise time is around 2ns
• PCB is FR4 with a Er or ~4.1
• PCB copper thickness is 1oz = 0.035mm
• Trace height above ground plane = 0.8mm
• Trace width = 0.2mm
• Trace length = 97mm
• RAM data input is 10kΩ in parallel with 5pF (capacitance from datasheet, resistance picked for a typical LVTTL input as nothing is given - the datasheet is pretty bad, for example the leakage current on p.21 is given as 10A!?)
• Driver impedance is 100Ω (taken from datasheet output high/low values and current -> Vh = Vdd - 0.4 @ 4mA, so 0.4V / 4mA = 100Ω)

Using wCalc (a transmission line calculator tool) set to microstrip mode and punching the numbers in, we get:

• Zo = 177.6Ω
• L = 642.9 pH/mm
• C = 0.0465 pF/mm
• R = 34.46 mΩ/mm
• Delay = 530.4 ps

Now if we enter these values into LTSpice using the lossy transmission line element and simulate we get:

Here is the simulation of the above circuit:

From this result, we can see with a 100 Ω output impedance we shouldn't expect any problems.

Just for interest, say we had a driver with an output impedance of 20 Ω, the result would be quite different (even at 50 Ω there is 0.7 V over/undershoot. Note that this is partly due to the 5pF input capacitance causing ringing, the overshoot at 2ns would be less with no capacitance [~3.7V], so as Kortuk points out check lumped parameters as well even if not treating as a TLine - see end):

A rule of thumb is if the delay time (time for signal to travel from driver to input) is more than 1/6th of the risetime, then we must treat the trace as a transmission line (note that some say 1/8th, some say 1/10th, which are more conservative) With a 0.525 ns delay and 2ns rise time giving 2 / 0.525 = 3.8 (<6) we have to treat it as a TLine. If we increase the rise time to 4ns -> 4 / 0.525 = 7.61 and do the same 20 Ω simulation again we get:

We can see the ringing is much less, so probably no action needs to be taken.

So to answer the question, assuming I'm close with the parameters, then it's unlikely that leaving them out will cause you problems - especially since I picked a rise/fall time of 2ns, which is faster than the LPC1788 datasheet (p.88 Tr min = 3 ns, Tfall min = 2.5 ns)
To be sure, putting a 50 Ω series resistor on each line probably wouldn't hurt.

### Lumped-Component Model

As noted above, even if the line is not a transmission line we can still have ringing caused by the lumped parameters. The trace L and receiver C can cause plenty of ringing if the Q is high enough.
A rule of thumb is that in response to a perfect step input, a Q of 0.5 or less will not ring, a Q of 1 will have 16% overshoot and a Q of 2 44% overshoot.
In practice no step input is perfect, but if the signal step has significant energy above the LC resonant frequency then there will be ringing.

So for our 20 Ω driver impedance example, if we just treat the line as a lumped circuit, the Q will be:

$Q = \dfrac{\sqrt{\dfrac{L}{C}}}{Rs} = \dfrac{\sqrt{\dfrac{62.36 nH}{9.511 pF}}}{20 \Omega} = 4.05$

(Capacitance is 5pF input capacitance + line capacitance - line resistance ignored)

The response to a perfect step input will be:

$V_{overshoot} = 3.3 V \cdot e^{-\dfrac{\pi}{\sqrt{ (4 \cdot Q^2) - 1}} } = 2.23 V$

So the worst case overshoot peak will be 3.3V + 2.23V = ~5.5V

For a rise time of 2 ns, we need to calculate the LC resonant frequency and the spectral energy above this due to the risetime:

Ringing frequency = 1 / (2PI * sqrt(LC)) = 1 / (2PI * sqrt(62.36nH * 9.511pF)) = 206MHz

Ringing frequency = $\dfrac{1}{2 \pi \cdot \sqrt{LC}} = \dfrac{1}{2 \pi \cdot \sqrt{62.36nH \cdot 9.511pF}}$ = 206MHz

A risetime of 2 ns has significant energy below the (rule of thumb) "knee" frequency , which is:

0.5 / Tr = 0.5 / 2 ns = 250 MHz, which is above the ringing frequency calculated above.

With a knee frequency of exactly the ringing frequency, the overshoot will be around half that of the perfect step input, so at ~1.2 times the knee frequency we're probably looking at around 0.7 of the perfect step response:

So 0.7 * 2.23 V = ~1.6 V

Estimated overshoot peak with 2 ns risetime = 3.3 V + 1.6 V = 4.9 V

The solution is to reduce the Q to 0.5, which corresponds to a $\dfrac{\sqrt{\dfrac{L}{C}}}{0.5}$ = 162 Ω resistance (160 Ω will do).
With the 100 Ω driver resistance from above, this would mean a 60 Ω series resistor (hence the "adding a 50 Ω series resistor wouldn't hurt" above)

Simulations:

Perfect Step Simulation:

2 ns Risetime Simulation:

Solution (with 100 Ω Rdrv + 60 Ω series resistor = 160 Ω total R1 added):

We can see adding the 160 Ω resistor produces the 0 V overshoot critically damped response expected.

The above calculations are based on rules of thumb and are not utterly exact, but should get close enough in most cases. The excellent book "High Speed Digital Design" by Jonhson and Graham is an excellent reference for these kind of calculations and much more (read the NEWCO example chapter for similar to the above, but better - much of the above was based on knowledge from this book)

• @OliGlaser, generally, in the real world, do we measure L and C of a microstrip (for a lumped system) or do we just calculate it to get a educated guess for a resistor for a Q of 0.5 and then adjust that value empirically? – Saad Sep 13 '12 at 10:30
• I'd say it depends on your project and tools. If you are using high end PCB tools then this stuff and more besides will be done for you automatically if you specify the right constraints. If not using expensive tools it definitely pays to at least run the initial estimates to weigh up whether you might run into problems - it doesn't take long and can potentially avoid a lot of issues later. If not sure, you can always do stuff like add pads for a termination resistor to be fitted if needed (various values can be tried - empirically is fine if it works) – Oli Glaser Sep 13 '12 at 13:57
• Also note that you don't need the Q to be spot on 0.5, below this is okay too (it's above where the ringing starts - underdamped) 0.5 is just the optimum value (critically damped) for fastest rise time with no overshoot. As you increase R (overdamped) the risetime will slow, and eventually become an issue but you will usually have some margin. – Oli Glaser Sep 13 '12 at 14:01

Altera recommends their use with some types of SDRAM in this document, but says that they can be avoided by using internal termination for the FPGA and SDRAM, if it is offered. Neither of the FPGA boards I have with SDRAM have any external termination on the connections and the devices don't have internal termination. It looks like they should be used, ideally, but in practice they are often left off. You should get away with it.

• I haven't either- but the manufacturer of my development board used them, so I thought I should as well – özg Aug 24 '12 at 13:09
• @user9663 If you are going to do any sort of emissions testing I would think the termination resistors are a good idea to prevent ringing. To be honest though, I have very little experience with SDRAM. – justing Aug 24 '12 at 17:32