# Astable 555 not oscillating [closed]

I've been struggling with building a 555 timer for a project. I get the expected voltage at pin 3 (output), but the problem is that it's not oscillating. The Vout is constantly 8.4V, while I expected a 70% duty cycle - 5s on, 2s off.

I've pinpointed the problem to be C1 not charging up to 2/3 of Vcc so it can't start discharging. It goes up to 5.3V - 5.4V and stays there. Vcc is 9.8 V, so 2/3 of it would be approximately 6.5V.

Things I've tried so far (apart from scouring the internet for all kinds of 555 troubleshooting problems):

• Trying with a different capacitor - both an electrolytic and a non-electrolytic 10 uF cap gives the same result.
• Testing all connections with and without the circuit, with and without power on, and measuring voltages across different points.
• Buying 2 additional ICs to test with them, in case there's something wrong with the 555 chip itself.
• Trying with a 43kO, 30kO, 100uF combination, instead of the 430kO, 300kO, 10uF combination I had originally used.

All of the above to no avail. So here's my plea for help! Below you'll find a list of parts and the diagram itself:

1. R1 - 430 kO
2. R2 - 300 kO
3. R3 - 200 O - just a test load to see if it's working.
4. C1 - 10 uF electrolytic. This is the one that's getting up to 5.4V only, instead of 2/3 Vcc (6.5V).
5. C2 - 10nF
6. IC1 - the NE555P chip.

All the calculations were done based on this handy calculator: https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/tools/555-timer-astable-circuit

Here's the diagram:

EDIT: Decided to try to try again with the lower resistor and higher capacitor values. It worked. Perhaps the capacitor was faulty, or there wasn't enough current to charge it all the way up to 6.5V? Either way, these are the values that work, for anybody with the same problem:

• R1 - 43 kO
• R2 - 30 kO
• C1 - 100 uF
• First of all, read this post: electronics.stackexchange.com/a/28255/41856 . Second, you show a headphone jack for the power supply, and on top of that you are using the ground connection for VCC. Are you sure you don't have things connected backwards in the real world? Without drawing a neat, accurate schematic that matches what you actually built, answering questions like this is next to impossible. – DerStrom8 Jul 27 '18 at 10:38
• There, I've fixed the diagram. Of course I don't have it connected backwards in the real world, it's obviously not consistent with the measurements I've made and described. The jack was there for illustrative purposes only. – Rumen Rumenov Jul 27 '18 at 11:03
• Rubbish schematic! – Leon Heller Jul 27 '18 at 11:29
• Leon Heller Would you please elaborate? – Rumen Rumenov Jul 27 '18 at 11:34
• @RumenRumenov If the supply was connected backwards then it could have damaged something within the IC and the result could be just about anything, even the output being constantly on. That's why I mentioned it. Next time draw a schematic that's consistent with your actual problem. How can we know that you haven't mis-wired your actual circuit? I can't trust your schematic because you already proved it was inconsistent with what you built. – DerStrom8 Jul 27 '18 at 12:38