I'm searching for some polarized surface mount device capacitors on lcsc.com and notice that they only have tolerances of \$20\%\$ tolerance devices in their catalog for this type of SMD device whereas the through hole counter parts have much lower tolerances. Is this normal for this type of device? My inherent feeling is that a \$20\%\$ tolerance is rather large.


The capacitors will be used in a Li-Po charge management circuit as shown below:

Li-Po charge circuit

  • \$\begingroup\$ +/- 20% is fairly standard for electrolytic capacitors, whether surface mount or through hole, certainly panasonic have the same tolerance on the smd and through hole parts for the same family. \$\endgroup\$
    – Colin
    Commented Aug 29, 2018 at 9:11
  • \$\begingroup\$ These are generally designed for a purpose where this tolerance is quite normal, although from memory I would have said the most I saw was -5/+20 \$\endgroup\$
    – PlasmaHH
    Commented Aug 29, 2018 at 9:13
  • \$\begingroup\$ Do you think it would be safe to assume that a data sheet application circuit would operate fine with a 20% tolerance? There is nothing in the application circuit that explicitly states tolerance of components. \$\endgroup\$
    – Blargian
    Commented Aug 29, 2018 at 9:33
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ What are the capacitors used for? \$\endgroup\$
    – Colin
    Commented Aug 29, 2018 at 9:34
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Colin I have updated the post with the schematic. They'll be used in a li-po battery charging circuit. \$\endgroup\$
    – Blargian
    Commented Aug 29, 2018 at 9:46

1 Answer 1


Yes, it's completely normal. Electrolytic capacitors (and also typically high capacitance MLCC capacitors) are not usually designed into applications where tight tolerance is important. For a filter capacitor -20/+80% is sometimes just fine.

You should use an MLCC ceramic capacitor, but keep in mind that the tolerance can be worse than 20%, and almost always in the wrong direction- down, when you take voltage coefficient into account. Very small (physically) capacitors operated at close to the rated voltage are usually the worst in that regard.

Ceramic caps are what is recommended in the datasheet. Ceramic capacitors have lower ESR (they are "better") but that may cause problems in some situations, but in this case there are no issues from ESR.

The datasheet says (for a particular configuration):

Use standard value 10 μF, 25 V, X5R, ±20% ceramic capacitor (that is, Panasonic 1206 ECJ-3YB1E106M

If you were to subsitute a Murata 0402 10uF/6.3V cap (adequate for a single 4.2V cell) the tolerance is given as +/-20% but typically at 4.2V the capacitance would be less than 3uF, and probably less than 2uF if you take temperature and bias and tolerance into account. So +/-20% is a bit of a dream. Maybe at room temperature and with 0V across it, plus they can actually make the capacitors much more accurately than +/-20% under set conditions so they're actually cutting it on the low side (typically 9uF at room temperature with 0V bias).


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.