I know that cassettes store an analog signal, but is the signal Amplitude-Modulated (AM) or Frequency Modulated (FM)?
-
\$\begingroup\$ Shouldn't it be on DSP SE? \$\endgroup\$– Failed ScientistOct 21, 2018 at 10:47
-
2\$\begingroup\$ @FailedScientist there's nothing digital about your standard audio cassette (though there are digital tape formats too.) \$\endgroup\$– Нет войнеOct 21, 2018 at 16:49
-
\$\begingroup\$ @topomorto True true! I missed pretty basic thing here. \$\endgroup\$– Failed ScientistOct 21, 2018 at 17:38
3 Answers
Neither, there is no modulation involved. The magnetization on the media is directly (and hopefully fairly linearly) related to the waveform amplitude.
There is a high frequency bias signal added to the audio signal, to get the resulting signal on the tape to a linear range of the magnetization curve, but the signal at the head is a sum of the two, not a modulation.
That image is from here, a good description of the process. This is stressing my memory of tape decks I had 40 years ago... The one instance I recall of amplitude modulation (kinda) was Dolby HX, which changed to amplitude of the bias in response to high amplitude audio signals, to keep the resulting signal from going into saturation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolby_noise-reduction_system#Dolby_HX/HX-Pro
-
1\$\begingroup\$ Thank you! Stupid me didn't even consider that... \$\endgroup\$ Oct 18, 2018 at 14:00
-
16\$\begingroup\$ That said, although what ends up on the tape is linear, it is recorded onto the tape using some bias signal to get the resulting signal in a linear region of the magnetization curve, and a (usually) AC bias signal is also included in the signal going to the head. There shoudn't be any intermodulation between the two though. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tape_bias \$\endgroup\$– Phil GOct 18, 2018 at 14:07
-
1\$\begingroup\$ It might be appropriate to distinguish between the recording signal and the recorded signal. The signal applied to the tape (the recording signal) by the write head is AM. The signal recovered by the read head (the recorded signal) has lost the bias component and is not modulated (at least not in the sense we're using here). So labelling the process as AM or not is a matter for argument. \$\endgroup\$ Oct 18, 2018 at 22:53
-
1\$\begingroup\$ AM or Amplitude Modulation is, by definition, the process by which we take a carrier signal (with a fixed frequency) and change its amplitude with the signal of interest (information). It is a MULTIPLICATIVE process. \$\endgroup\$ Oct 29, 2018 at 21:44
-
1\$\begingroup\$ However, when recording a signal in a magnetic medium, we ADD/SUM (not multiply) a fixed DC value or an AC signal to the signal of interest. \$\endgroup\$ Oct 29, 2018 at 21:45
It is neither, the signal is recorded as a magnetized pattern without any form of modulation. This can give an impression of how that works:
I got that from here.
See, no modulation needed, the amount of magnetic flux is proportional to the actual audio signal.
Some HiFi Stereo Video recorders do use FM to record the audio though.
-
1\$\begingroup\$ That page is not really an accurate description. It is not the particles that are realigned during recording, it is the magnetic domains within the particles (depending on the technology, each particle can have one or more domains, in rough sense they define the analog resolution of the material). They way that is presented on the slide is misleading IMO. The domains are groups of magnetic moments that share a common orientation. It is akin to a crystallization pattern when the material is brought below its Curie temperature. If they kept the random orientation it would have been closer. \$\endgroup\$ Oct 18, 2018 at 15:01
-
1\$\begingroup\$ how long does it take for those moments to decay? :o \$\endgroup\$– DanielOct 18, 2018 at 19:16
-
1\$\begingroup\$ @Daniel If the material is stored at room temperature or lower, the "magnetic decay times" are tens or hundreds of years. In practice, the plastic tape in old recordings deteriorates far quicker, and that often leads to some of the magnetic material being physically stripped off the tape every time it is played. That obviously can produce a rapid decay in the sound reproduction quality. \$\endgroup\$ Oct 19, 2018 at 18:27
Analog tape recording for audio cassette doesnt require modulation. But since magnetization ability of the particles on the tape does not have linear response at low signal levels of the audio to be recorded, poor response will result during playback.
To prevent this, technique called biasing is applied. This creates very linear response of magnetization for the entire dynamic range required for high fidelity audio.
When recording, magnetic tape has a nonlinear response as determined by its coercivity. Without bias, this response results in poor performance especially at low signal levels. A recording signal which generates a magnetic field strength less than tape's coercivity is unable to magnetise the tape and produces little playback signal. Bias increases the signal quality of most audio recordings significantly by pushing the signal into more linear zones of the tape's magnetic transfer function.
– Wikipedia
So, you may have confused between this high frequency AC bias used in audio recording with modulation.
-
4\$\begingroup\$ @isdi: To quote wikipedia: "modulation is the process of varying one or more properties of a periodic waveform, called the carrier signal, with a modulating signal that typically contains information to be transmitted". The direct addition of two signals is not modulation under this definition. \$\endgroup\$– mbrigOct 18, 2018 at 17:18
-
3\$\begingroup\$ To further clarify, a modulated signal will have a spectrum centred on the carrier frequency, with bandwidth/sidebands/etc determined by the modulation. A hypothetical tape recording of a pure 5kHz tone and a 100kHz AC bias with have have a spectrum with content at exactly 5kHz and 100kHz, nowhere else (barring noise). \$\endgroup\$– mbrigOct 18, 2018 at 17:20
-
1\$\begingroup\$ Biasing looks more like dithering than modulation \$\endgroup\$– NayukiOct 18, 2018 at 19:57
-
1\$\begingroup\$ When using high frequency A.C. bias, audio frequency will ride on it without affecting its frequency or its peak to peak amplitude. Only its absolute value above zero will keep on changing according to the audio. This is just arithmetic addition of two waves, not modulation. \$\endgroup\$ Oct 18, 2018 at 22:53
-
1\$\begingroup\$ Although the signal sent to the record head merely has a mix of high-frequency and audio frequency signal sent to it, the effect on the tape is very similar to pulse-width modulation. \$\endgroup\$– supercatOct 19, 2018 at 19:59