0
\$\begingroup\$

For a hobby project I would like to switch between two power supplys. The load are two motors which can also be switched on and off separatly. The two motors are BLDC controllers in reality. I am only in developing phase so no test arrangement was done.

I developed the following circuit, which I am not sure about if it works flawlessly: Schematic

  • U4-7 are highside MOSFET drivers with an integrated charge pump to achieve voltages above VCC.
  • R7, R8, R15, R16 are pull-down resistors to avoid floating potentials on the driver input and R1, R2, R9, R10 have the same function but at the output of the drivers.
  • Q1-4 are my n-channel power MOFETS (V_GS_max = +/-16V)
  • R3, R6, R11, R14 are restricting the maximum gate current
  • and R4, R5, R12, R13 I think are necessary to ensure that V_GS is never above 16V despite the source potential is floating (e.g. if Q1 is on and Q3 is off)

Some facts:

  • Maximum power-supply voltage: ~25V
  • Maximum current: ~50A through Q1/Q2 and ~25A through Q3/Q4
  • Q1 and Q2 can not be on at the same time (software-wise)
  • Q3/Q4 are PWM driven the first second after startup (to reduce the inrush current of the BLDC capacitors)

So my questions are:

  • are there any considerations for stable operation?
  • are there any maximum ratings which could be exceeded (especially V_GS or crossflows)?

I would appreciate your advices!

EDIT: I updated my schematic drawing with new MOSFET drivers some unnecessary pull-ups removed and some additional capacitors for voltage stabilization: enter image description here

The problem with transverse currents if one battery has a lower voltage than the other is in a new thread: MOSFET-switching between two power supplys: how to avoid transverse current?

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Welcome to EE.SE. Unless you need a dual 'AND' function to drive high voltage at high speed, what is this circuit for? \$\endgroup\$ – Sparky256 Oct 21 '18 at 22:41
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thank you! This curcuit is for an uninterrupted power supply: if BATT2A is lost or too low BATT2B is used. The two motors can be switched on and off for overcurrent protection. \$\endgroup\$ – Florian Oct 21 '18 at 22:43
  • \$\begingroup\$ You are going to need to do something with the back EMF from the motors during switching. Schottky catch diodes at a minimum. \$\endgroup\$ – Dean Franks Oct 21 '18 at 23:06
  • \$\begingroup\$ Your gate driver is actually a high-side load switch. It has a maximum output voltage of VCC. All your N-FETs are going to operate in saturation. \$\endgroup\$ – sstobbe Oct 22 '18 at 0:01
  • \$\begingroup\$ Dean Franks, no the motors are already driven by a BLDC-controller and i only supply this controller. @sstobbe, ok thats very bad, I was not sure about that driver... do you know a suitable Highside-Driver? \$\endgroup\$ – Florian Oct 22 '18 at 6:49
0
\$\begingroup\$

If you wish to use n-channel MOSFETs as static switching elements, you will need to create an auxiliary power supply rail. To drive a high side n-MOS into triode you need bring the gate 5 V to 10V above the supply rail you're switching.

Some gate-drivers include a bootstrap capacitor to operate as a charge pump. However this requires that the load is being switched periodically and not a static output.

So, you can either generate an auxiliary power supply rail above VCC with a charge pump or boost converter.

Or, Implement your design using p-channel MOSFETS. Just make sure not to over-drive the gate beyond its rated Vgs (a zener clamp works well here).

You will also want to include bulk and decoupling capacitors as well.

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thank you for your answer! I know that V_GS has to be over V_CC for a highside n channel MOSFET. Today I found a perfect driver for my FETs: the LT1910 from Linear Technology. (and this driver has an included charge pump with timer for contioius operation) P channel MOSFETS are not designated due to their drawbacks. Where do I need bulk and decoupling capacitors? \$\endgroup\$ – Florian Oct 22 '18 at 13:51
  • \$\begingroup\$ Your present design would have also over-driven Vgs to - 24V. The body diode of Q1 or Q2 would conduct into the alternate battery pack as well. All the ICs should have decoupling caps. \$\endgroup\$ – sstobbe Oct 22 '18 at 14:10
  • \$\begingroup\$ In which state is V_GS at -24V? Do you mean if one battery is lower than the other one, the s-d diode will conduct? But how can i avoid that? I guess you mean all outputs... but why should i need decoupling capacitors technically? \$\endgroup\$ – Florian Oct 22 '18 at 14:38
  • \$\begingroup\$ Say Q1 had been turned on. Both Q1 and Q2 have their sources equal to VCC. Now you are pulling the gate of Q2 to ground, so Vgs = -Vcc (upwards of 25V you listed in your question). Those are all good precise technical questions that do well on this site. Ask a question :) \$\endgroup\$ – sstobbe Oct 22 '18 at 14:47
  • \$\begingroup\$ Ok I understand, but V_GS will never be pulled to ground because the driver IC pulls V_GS to +Vcc if the input is low. Did not want to spam the board, but if this question is still unsolved for me after overthinking I will probably place a new qustion for that topics. So do you see other possible problems except of the one mentioned? \$\endgroup\$ – Florian Oct 22 '18 at 15:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.