# Active (P), Reactive (Q, D) and Apparent (S) Power from Instantaneous Power (p)

I am having a difficultly with producing $$\S, P, Q \$$ and $$\D\$$ from Instantaneous Power $$\p(t)\$$.

Let's say that both voltage and current are clear sine waves. Then:

$$\p(t) = Vsin(ωt+φ_V) \cdot Isin(ωt+φ_I)\$$

and by using the identity

$$\sinA sinB = \frac{1}{2} (cos(A-B) - cos(A+B)) \$$

instantaneous power can be written as

$$\p(t) = \frac{VI}{2}cos(φ_V-φ_I) - \frac{VI}{2}cos(2ωt+φ_V+φ_I)\$$

Now, it can be proved that at a pure sine wave $$\A_{RMS} = \frac{A_{peak}}{\sqrt2} \$$, hence:

$$\P = V_{RMS}I_{RMS} \cdot cos(φ_V-φ_I)\$$.

How to prove that $$\Q = V_{RMS}I_{RMS}\cdot sin(φ_V-φ_I)\$$ and $$\S = V_{RMS}I_{RMS}\$$?

Moreover, how to prove that

$$\P = \sum_{k=1}^\infty V_{RMS}I_{RMS} \cdot cos(φ_V-φ_I) \\ Q=\sum_{k=1}^\infty V_{RMS}I_{RMS} \cdot sin(φ_V-φ_I) \\ D = \sqrt{\sum_{k\ne j}^{\infty} U_k^2I_j^2 +U_j^2I_K^2 - 2 U_kI_kU_jI_jcos(φ_k-φ_j)}\$$

when voltage and current are not sines, but arbitrary, periodic waveforms?

I don't expect from anyone to provide me with the full proof, but to show me the right direction.

EDIT:

In order to prove that $$\Q = V_{RMS}I_{RMS}\cdot sin(φ_V-φ_I)\$$ - for pure sine waves - one must analyze the current to two components. One that's in phase with the voltage and one that's $$\\pm90^o \$$ out of phase. By drawing the phasors $$\\vec{V}, \vec{I_X}\$$ and $$\ \vec{I_Y}\$$ this becomes obvious.

Starting with the definition for active power

$$\P = \frac{1}{T} \int_0^T v(t) \cdot i(t) \cdot dt = \frac{1}{T} \int_0^T p(t) \cdot dt\$$

one gets the following expression for the power for linear networks (containing R, L, C, all constant):

$$\P = \sum_{k=1}^\infty V_{k,RMS} \cdot I_{k,RMS} \cdot cos(φ_{V,k}-φ_{I,k})\$$

For a single (pure) sinewave there is

$$\P = V_{RMS} \cdot I_{RMS} \cdot cos(φ_{V}-φ_{I})\$$

Above expressions have the meaning of power consumed (e.g. in form of heat).

Now there is the definition of reactive power as

$$\Q = \sum_{k=1}^\infty V_{k,RMS} \cdot I_{k,RMS} \cdot sin(φ_{V,k}-φ_{I,k})\$$

The important point is that this is a definition, not something derived. In case of linear networks it has physical meaning, in case of nonlinear networks (containing switches, diodes, nonlinear inductors ...) is has not.

Same is true for the apparent power which is also a definition which cannot be derived, and which is defined as

$$\S = V_{RMS} \cdot I_{RMS}\$$

It allows to compare size of rotating machines and/or transformers in a grid (of fixed frequency e.g. 0 Hz or 60 Hz) which is very useful for the power engineer.

For linear networks one can easily show from the equations (definitions) above that

$$\S^2 = P^2 + Q^2\$$

In case of nonlinear networks the above equation does not work and another power term is added as

$$\S^2 = P^2 + Q^2 + D^2\$$

This gives the definition of D as

$$\D = \sqrt {S^2 - P^2 - Q^2}\$$

I found this argumentation in my old university textbook (Franz Zach, 'Leistungselektronik: Bauelemente, Leistungskreise, Steuerungskreise, Beeinflussungen', ISBN-10: 3709144590, Springer, Oct. 1980).

• Instantaneous power p(t) results in P which is easy to show for linear networks.
• Q is defined, not derived from p(t), with the background of linear networks.
• S is defined, not derived from p(t), with the background of electrical machines in the grid.
• D is defined, not derived from p(t), in order to bring together P, Q, and S in nonlinear networks.
• I don't quite agree. It's not just a definition. When V and I are sine waves, by analyzing I in two axis, one parallel to V and the other perpendicular to it, P and Q are obtained and since they are linearly independent, a new form of power is obtained. It contains both the current that produces actual work and the one that oscillates between the source and the load. It has a physical meaning, since even though the second current does not produce work, it can reduce the voltage received by the load, due to R and L of the line. Same thing applies if the current is not pure sine. Commented Dec 28, 2018 at 1:21
• Let's say that the current is pulsating (+5/-5 A). Then it can be analyzed into a infinite sum of sine waves, of different frequencies (Fourier). So, the basic harmonic (50/60Hz) may have a phase difference with the voltage. This is producing P and Q. All other harmonics cannot produce active power, so they produce D, a new form of current that oscillates between the load and the source. That's why I think that there is a physical meaning, even with non-linear loads. Commented Dec 28, 2018 at 1:26

I think I found the answer I am looking for. I am presenting it here, so it will be available to anyone that is interested.

First consider:

$$\v(t) = V_1cos(ω_1t+φ_{V_1}) \\ i(t)=I_1cos(ω_1t+φ_{I_1})\$$

then:

$$\p(t) = v(t)\cdot i(t) = \\V_1I_1cos(ω_1t+φ_{V_1})cos(ω_1t+φ_{I_1}) = \\\frac{1}{2}V_1I_1(cos(φ_{V_1}-φ_{I_1})+cos(2ω_1t+φ_{V_1}+φ_{I_1})) \$$

Let's define $$\θ = φ_{V_1}-φ_{I_1}\$$, hence $$\φ_{V_1}+φ_{I_1} = 2φ_{V_1}-θ\$$ and the above can be written as:

$$\p(t) =\frac{1}{2}V_1I_1(cos(θ) + cos(2ω_1t+2φ_{V_1}-θ))\$$, but

$$\cos(2ω_1t+2φ_{V_1}-θ) = cos(2ω_1t+2φ_{V_1})cos(θ)+sin(2ω_1t+2φ_{V_1})sin(θ)\$$ and

$$\\frac{1}{2}V_1I_1 = \frac{V_1}{\sqrt(2)}\frac{I_1}{\sqrt(2)}= \tilde{V_1}\tilde{I_1}\$$

Finally:

$$\p(t) = \tilde{V_1}\tilde{I_1}cos(θ)(1+cos(2ω_1t+2φ_{V_1})) + \tilde{V_1}\tilde{I_1}sin(θ)sin(2ω_1t+2φ_{V_1}) \Rightarrow \\ p(t) =P(1+cos(2ω_1t+2φ_{V_1}))+Qsin(2ω_1t+2φ_{V_1})\$$

It is clear that one component of the instantaneous power is always positive (P) and the other one oscillates back and forth, with mean value equal to zero (Q). Both components have double the frequency of the initial signals and an initial phase.

Now the fun begins...

Consider

$$\v(t) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty V_ncos(nω_1t+φ_{V_n}) \\ i(t)=\sum_{n=1}^\infty I_ncos(nω_1t+φ_{I_n})\$$

$$\p(t) = \\ V_1I_1cos(ω_1t+φ_{V_1})cos(ω_1t+φ_{I_1}) +V_2I_2cos(2ω_1t+φ_{V_2})cos(2ω_1t+φ_{I_2})+... \\ V_1I_2cos(ω_1t+φ_{V_1})cos(2ω_1t+φ_{I_2}) + V_1I_3cos(ω_1t+φ_{V_1})cos(3ω_1t+φ_{I_3}) + ... \\ V_2I_1cos(2ω_1t+φ_{V_2})cos(ω_1t+φ_{I_1}) + ...\$$

Hence, it is possible to write instantaneous power as:

$$\p(t) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty V_nI_ncos(nω_1t+φ_{V_n})cos(nω_1t+φ_{I_n})+\sum_{j\ne k} [V_jI_kcos(jω_1t+φ_{V_j})cos(kω_1t+φ_{I_k})+V_kI_jcos(kω_1t+φ_{V_k})cos(jω_1t+φ_{I_j})]\$$

As proved above, the first sum provides P and Q as:

$$\P = \sum_{k=1}^\infty \tilde{V_k}\tilde{I_k}cos(θ)\\Q = \sum_{k=1}^\infty \tilde{V_k}\tilde{I_k}sin(θ)\$$

The second sum is what is called Distortion Power and it can be calculated as:

$$\D=\sqrt{S^2-P^2-Q^2}\$$, where:

$$\S^2 = \sum_{k=1}^\infty[{V_k^2}{I_k^2}]+\sum_{k\ne j}[V_k^2I_j^2+V_j^2I_k^2] \\ P^2 = \sum_{k=1}^\infty[V_k^2I_k^2cos^2(φ_k)]+\\ V_1I_1V_2I_2cos(φ_1)cos(φ_2)+V_1I_1V_3I_3cos(φ_1)cos(φ_3)+... \\ Q^2 = \sum_{k=1}^\infty[V_k^2I_k^2sin^2(φ_k)]+\\ V_1I_1V_2I_2sin(φ_1)sin(φ_2)+V_1I_1V_3I_3sin(φ_1)sin(φ_3)+...\$$

Hence

$$\P^2+Q^2 = \sum_{k=1}^\infty[V_k^2I_k^2(cos^2(φ_k)+sin^2(φ_k))]-\\ V_1I_1V_2I_2(cos(φ_1)cos(φ_2)+sin(φ_1)sin(φ_2))-... = \\ \sum_{k=1}^\infty[V_k^2I_k^2]-\sum_{k\ne j}2V_kI_kV_jI_jcos(φ_k-φ_j)\$$

Last step is:

$$\D=\sqrt{\sum_{k\ne j}V_k^2I_j^2+V_j^2I_k^2-2V_kI_kV_jI_jcos(φ_k-φ_j)}\$$

I skipped some calculations, but they are easy to make.

• Thank you for coming back to provide this. Can some third party check this please?
– K H
Commented Dec 29, 2018 at 5:32
• @KH There's a paper that I've found, hope it helps. measurement.sk/M2013/doc/proceedings/075_Kralikova-1.pdf Commented Nov 24, 2020 at 0:07

I'll try a simpler explanation. Start from the expression of the total power, S=V*I, which is Cpt. Obvious. If you are to calculate the active power, you can derive it like you, or @UweD did, and you get, simplistic, V\I*cos($$\\phi\$$). The punchline is that, since you are working with harmonic signals, then you are, implicitly, talking about orthogonality, which automatically gives you the reactive power as V*I*sin($$\\phi\$$). This for linear networks, for nonlinear, it's, again, as @UweD points out.