I have three questions below. I would like to understand how their respective answers were reached, this is a question in my current class and everyone in the class has A-Level mathematics experience - I have asked my tutor to explain but they talk very technically and I'm at a loss. I was hoping to get a simple answer from someone in this community, this formula is important to a project I am making - I am making an algorithm that sniffs packets and converts the delay result as png. I need to understand the maths behind it.

For Question 1: Why is the answer 2ms (Why 2m rather than just m) and what does the "Over" signify?

For Question 2: Why is the answer 2LR (Why 2L rather than just L)?

For Question 3: And I just can't figure out what this answer means or how it is reached.


Added QuestionExtra Question

(Added Question)


1 Answer 1


For a:

The term over is a common term to express a communication channel - we send data over a link.

Each link (a and b) are set to m metres. Therefore the total distance the signal must travel from host A to host C is m + m metres; i.e. 2m metres.

For b:

I am assuming something here; the packet from host A must be completely received by host B prior to host B then forwarding the packet to host C although it is not explicitly stated. The transmission delay is therefore the complete transmission delay from host A to host B and then the packet must be placed on the link to host C and incurs another transmission delay of L bits.

That being the case, the transmission delay is the cost of placing the packet on the link twice, yielding 2L bits of delay.

For c:

This is simply looking for the case of where the transmission delay is equal to the propagation delay of the link. This requires a solution in terms of distance (which is the only contributor to propagation delay for this question).

The solution is a relatively simple algebraic re-arrangement and finally the numbers are plugged in (multiply both sides by s and then divide both sides by 2).

  • \$\begingroup\$ Hi this is very helpful thank you for this answer. Is it possible to explain two other variations of the question? I am confident in my understanding on the first few you explained \$\endgroup\$
    – Kale
    Commented Jan 2, 2019 at 16:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.