7
\$\begingroup\$

I'm trying to understand how this circuit works on the input stage to the 4192A Impedance Analyzer.

4192A Impedance Analyzer Transimpedance Frontend

Apologies for the quality... this is the best scan I could find. The design is furnished with the following explanation:

In parallel with the basic feedback loop (R145) for the current to voltage function, the secondary loop, consisting of R132, C112, and the class C bias push-pull amplifier stage (Q30 and Q31) applies a non-linear feedback to suppress the output for excessive inputs. Normally, both Q30 and Q31 are off with no base bias. Over almost the entire voltage range of the amplifier output, the secondary feedback loop is open, so the I-V converter amplifier has a linear gain characteristic. When a transient unbalance input approaches the saturation level of the amplifier, Q30 and Q31 turn on in the peak region of the output before saturation occurs. As the secondary feedback loop decreases the gain of the I-V converter, further increase in the output voltage is suppressed. It moderates the saturation of the amplifier and, consequently, prevents a phase shift at the output (an effect of saturation). [From the 4192A service manual]

First of all, I want to ask if, after eliminating Q30 and Q31, there's a way to see how the described phase shift comes about near saturation. Is this a property of op-amps in general or just the way this amplifier is designed? This circuit is a kind of high gain amplifier with feedback and acts like an op-amp, right? Finally, I don't understand how adding Q30 and Q31 would cause the output to clip in a way that has less of a phase shift than driving the amplifier into saturation without Q30 and Q31 would. The only kind of phase shifting nonlinearity I understand is slew-induced distortion. Is that what they're referring to? I guess I can understand how using feedback to reduce the gain would reduce the slew rate, but the slewing is fastest near zero volts, which is where Q30 and Q31 are not reducing the gain. I had thought maybe the answer is in the time constant from R132 and C112, but this is only 316 ohms * 4.7 pF = 1.5 ns

Thanks in advance for having a look!

EDIT: Another thought. Could the phase shift be contributed by the amplifier's recovery time once driven into saturation? As in... if some of the BJTs are driven into saturation, I suppose you have to wait to remove the stored charge from the base before they come out of saturation and the amplifier responds. When the description says "saturation," do they perhaps not just mean "not railed," but also "no transistors are driven out of the active regime"

\$\endgroup\$

2 Answers 2

0
\$\begingroup\$

Until that topmost PNP turns on, nothing happens in the other 5 transistors, as far as I can tell from the schematic.

Its a hard-to-read drawing.

I've done similar circuits (high speed input clamps) on photodiode amplifiers for IRDA

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

The definition of saturation for a bjt (silicon any way), I believe is when VCe <= VCesat, which is typically 0.2V. And yes that means the collector voltage can get closer to the emitter voltage than the base voltage can.

I can't yet explain exactly how this circuit works but what they are saying is that the output of the amp is the emitters of the middle pair. The resistor on the far right is the feedback resistor. When the peaks get big enough, and it looks like if the output voltage is +/- about 0.65 or 0.7 volts bigger then the third stage turns into an emitter follower and the additional R and C join the feed back network, which lowers the gain and tends to stop the peak from saturating the earlier stage.

As for testing is this circuit in the impedance analyzer? Can you set up a case where the error would occur, and then with and without the clamp see what the indicated impedance is? The difference would be the phase shift.

If the circuit is on the bench or you can get into the instrument then you can use a two channel oscilloscope as a phase mater. One channel is connected to the input, the other to the output. The 'scope is put into X-Y mode. The gains of the two channels have to be adjusted to compensate for gain across between the in and out. The resultant "loop" is a function of the phase shift. Straight line is no phase shift. Circle is quadrature. ellipses major and minor axis is a function of phase shift. Whth the gain and possible distortion it may be difficult to get an accurate phase shift but I bet you can tell a difference between with and without the fixer circuit.

I'm not sure what the phase shift mechanism is either, it may be that as the amplifiers near saturation their bias points shift, causing an apparent change in phase.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.