I'm trying to calculate the stall current for a 12 V DC gear motor (919D1481):

datasheet specs

No load speed = 15800 RPM

No load current = 0.52 A

Nominal speed = 13360 RPM

Nominal current = 2.85 A

Nominal torque = 154.4 g·cm

Stall torque = 1000 g·cm $$$$

\begin{align} \Delta I &= 2.85\mathrm{A}-0.52\mathrm{A}\\ &=2.33\mathrm{A} \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad \end{align}

\begin{align} \Delta\mathcal{T} &= 1000\mathrm{g·cm}-154.4\mathrm{g·cm}\\ &=845.6\mathrm{g·cm} \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad \end{align}

\begin{align} I_{stall} &= \left(\frac{845.6\mathrm{g·cm}}{154.4\mathrm{g·cm}}\right)*2.33\mathrm{A}\\ &=12.76\mathrm{A} \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad \end{align}

Can you tell me if this is correct?



It looks about right.

For a crosscheck, see the rest of the datasheet for winding resistance R (or measure several times, rotating the shaft very slowly to find the minimum brush resistance) then I(stall) = V/R.

|improve this answer|||||
  • \$\begingroup\$ What would the formula be if the gearbox is taken into account? \$\endgroup\$ – somers Jan 2 '19 at 14:48
  • \$\begingroup\$ No winding resistance value in the datasheet unfortunately mfacomodrills.com/pdfs/gbxbrch1.pdf \$\endgroup\$ – somers Jan 2 '19 at 15:09
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ How could the gearbox change the DC resistance? Gearing trades higher torque for lower speed. \$\endgroup\$ – Brian Drummond Jan 2 '19 at 16:30

The calculated stall current seems reasonable, but the method of computation does not.

The data table is for performance of the motor only. It does not include a gearbox. There is no reason to consider the gearbox in estimating the stall current. If the no-load data was for a motor with a gearbox, the gearbox would be important. The stall current would be the same with or without the gear box.

The no-load loss is the total input power, 12 V x 0.52 A = 6.42 W. If friction is neglected, R = 6.24/0.52^2 = 23.1 ohms.

At maximum power, the input power is 12 V x 2.85 A = 34.2 W. Since the output power is 21.2 W, the total losses are 34.2 - 21.2 = 13 W. If friction is neglected, R = 13/2.85^2 = 1.6 ohms and stall current is 12/1.6 = 7.5 A.

Since neglecting friction gives two very different values for R, friction can not be neglected.

If the stall current is 12.76 amps, the armature resistance is 12 V / 12.76 A = 0.94 ohms, The resistive loss at no-load is 0.52^2 x 0.94 = 0.25 W, making the friction loss 5.99 W. At max efficiency, the resistive loss is 2.85^2 x 0.94 = 7.64 W. That makes the friction loss 5.86 watts.

That makes 12.76 A a reasonable estimate for stall current.

Here is another version of the motor data to be considered:

enter image description here

|improve this answer|||||

This is a reasonable approximation if the gearbox is ignored. Some portion of the 0.52A no-load current is due to the torque required to overcome friction, so the actual torque experienced by the stalled motor will be a little higher at stall than the calculated stall torque.

Remember that as you approach stall the motor will be less efficient as the winding losses increase. At stall you are 0% efficient so all of the ~150W of stall power will be converted to heat in the windings. It is likely that the motor cannot be run continuously at loads much above the nominal load.

|improve this answer|||||
  • \$\begingroup\$ How would I go about the calculation taking the gearbox into account? \$\endgroup\$ – somers Jan 2 '19 at 14:35
  • \$\begingroup\$ My understanding is that the gearing won't change the current value - it'll just allow a higher torque for the same current. \$\endgroup\$ – somers Jan 2 '19 at 15:18
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Since the table gives only theoretical results (100% efficient gears), a rule of thumb is that a good quality, small gearbox loses about 5% per stage; for example, a three-stage gearbox will be around 85% efficient. This efficiency may be lower for inexpensive gears. \$\endgroup\$ – John Birckhead Jan 2 '19 at 17:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.