0
\$\begingroup\$

im trying to make c++ project using atmel asf.

the compiler have:

C:\Program Files (x86)\Atmel\Studio\7.0\Packs\atmel\SAM4E_DFP\1.1.57\ic.sam4e\include\component\....

but in asf we have different files which are

src\ASF\sam\utils\cmsis\sam4e\include\component\

at beginning i thought they are the same. but now im confused. what is the difference?

is one of them came from standard cmsis stuff related to cortex-m0+ and the other is something defined by Atmel? and in c++ project they just give me the original cmsis? (if i dont make sense here then maybe i have big misunderstand of a lot of things)

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ I believe Atmel ASF is drivers and pre-made code, HALs etc? That is, fairly high-level code. CMSIS is the low-level standardized "CRT" that sets up the basic environment out of reset. Often quite badly written. \$\endgroup\$ – Lundin Jan 24 '19 at 13:48
  • \$\begingroup\$ CMSIS badly written? what do you mean. the paths above is low level definition of registers of components.. but they differ .. the ones in cmsis have reserved registers and ones in asf are detailed.. \$\endgroup\$ – Hasan alattar Jan 24 '19 at 15:51
  • \$\begingroup\$ It is quite common that they have a SystemInit which picks an on-chip RC oscillator for clock as default, and then run the rest of the setup, including time-consuming .data and .bss initialization, with that bad clock. And then the desired oscillator settings don't kick in before they are run from application code. That's an amateur setup. \$\endgroup\$ – Lundin Jan 25 '19 at 7:28
  • \$\begingroup\$ well i think they leave that for user to edit.. they run rc as its built in the chip .. i that's something they know about but they choose it so u can test your first code with correct timing setup ... but what i dont get is the components in cmsis and asf .. they are different.. u cant right drivers! \$\endgroup\$ – Hasan alattar Jan 25 '19 at 8:48
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Lundin SystemInit is a vendor specific call out of reset. Have a look at the startup files on the GitHub repository - it's called by Reset_Handler, but the content isn't part of CMSIS. \$\endgroup\$ – awjlogan Mar 22 '19 at 21:05
2
\$\begingroup\$

Basically, CMSIS is a vendor-independent interface for some ARM Cortex chips, while ASF is a restricted library for Atmel (now owned my microchip) devices.

ARM Primer

ARM Cortex is the core processor inside microntrollers from multiple vendors. It includes core components like SysTick, NVIC (Interrupt controller), and Micro Trace Buffer (MTB). This core is lisecensed to vendors like Atmel that design microntrollers around it, adding things like memory and peripherals (SERCOM, USB, etc)

The SAMD21 is an Atmel SAM microcontroller designed around an ARM Cortex-M0+ processor. You, as the programmer, have access to features of both.

CMSIS - Cortex Microcontroller Software Interface Standard

Link: https://developer.arm.com/embedded/cmsis

This is a hardware-abstraction layer (HAL) for Cortex-M and Cortex-A processors. It works with chips from Atmel, NXP, Freescale, etc. This standard includes low-level interfaces for using core components and lays out a template for creating hardware-dependent (per vendor) libraries as well. The aim is to create an interface which enables code to be portable across numerous chips. In other words, you can reuse the same code between chips from any vendor.

Pros: supports vendor-independent, portable code

Cons: difficult to achieve true vendor-independence, easy to screw up dependencies, tries to do too much and is fairly clunky & convoluted

ASF - Advanced (was Atmel) Software Framework

Link: https://asf.microchip.com/docs/latest/

This is an enormous code library that (should) work with any of Atmel's AVR or ARM microntrollers, as well as development boards like the xplained-pro series. See the link for the supported devices. The point is to provide working code for chip peripherals so developers don't have to redesign the wheel each time, providing a (mostly) similar interface across numerous devices.

Pros: Quicker development, familiar interfaces, lots of starter projects & examples

Cons: Extremely bloated and error prone code, trying too hard to be like Arduino

Crossover

Since the goal of CMSIS is to be vendor-independent over a few processor lines, but ASF is vendor-dependent but product-independent across multiple processors, the two don't fit together well. Of course, ASF uses CMSIS libs when it needs to, but it doesn't follow the standard. The biggest problem I've had with ASF is that it is overly abstracted, especially for low-resource microcontrollers where you need to know what is going on in the metal.

Creating a new project in Atmel Studio to blink an LED will use an obscene amount of memory space, pulling dozens of header and source files that do trivial operations, stringing them together in an extremely convoluted manner. Because the libraries need to do everything someone might want, they often do a lot of stuff you don't want them to be doing. Keep in mind, much of the code was developed by low-wage and inexperienced interns, and is not polished or efficient. You don't have to spend much time on AVR Freaks to encounter people with insight as to what goes on behind the scenes.

That said, if you want to design your own library, it's useful to look through the ASF example code to see how they initiated peripherals, as it's easy to overlook some step, especially with ARM chips that have multiple clock, generators, and so on. You can then create a platform-abstract layer interface that can, for example, enable and use the serial port on any chip by communicating with the vendor-specific code for a particular chip.

Consider these layers of code:

[ Application Programming Interface (API) ]
[ Vendor-Specific Implementation ]
[ Core Processor Implementation ]

The top layer (API) is what you put in your code. This would be things like

SERIAL_enable(port1, 9600, settings);
SERIAL_send(port1, "Hello, World!");

The middle layer defines those SERIAL functions which likely need to talk to some core processor component which is defined in the bottom layer. If you are following CMSIS, the middle layer can be swapped out for different platforms like the Atmel SAMD21 and NXP LPC810M, as long as each has a serial port. This would typically be done by some Makefile magic, passing a defined architecture parameter during compilation and linking.

Keep in mind, abstraction is a fundamental principal of software development, but can be your biggest enemy when you need to create efficient code on low-resource devices.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.