1
\$\begingroup\$

I have several circuits which I need to turn on and off wirelessly. The rules are:

  1. They are placed inside a transparent small box (about 50x50x50 cm)
  2. The control unit\transmitter can be placed anywhere outside the box, and has no power\shape\size\cost limitations
  3. I have about 10 circuits which need to be turned on and off individually. Each circuit has it's own set of batteries (3 x 1.5v) and consumes about 1.7mw
  4. It has to be very low weight - less then a gram
  5. Very low power consumption - on the orders of milliwatts

I have two directions, but not a good way to implement any of them. The first is to use IR with modulation, and the second is to use RF.

Any ideas? Thanks.

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ What is the range? \$\endgroup\$ – Leon Heller Sep 23 '12 at 12:28
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Less than a gram probably eliminates any canned modules with RF protocol, like WiFi or MiWi. IR is probably the best to look into if line and distance is OK. Also milliamps is a unit of current, not power. \$\endgroup\$ – Olin Lathrop Sep 23 '12 at 12:37
  • \$\begingroup\$ Hi Leon and Olin, I've edited the question after your remarks. The transmitter can be anywhere outside the box. And Olin, sorry for the mix-up. \$\endgroup\$ – Oren Wolf Sep 23 '12 at 12:44
  • \$\begingroup\$ Haha wireless activation "weight - less than a gram" - how is that even possible? \$\endgroup\$ – boardbite Sep 23 '12 at 13:20
  • \$\begingroup\$ Boardbite, I didn't say it was easy... For example, I've tried looking at MEMS devices which theoretically can be much lighter. \$\endgroup\$ – Oren Wolf Sep 23 '12 at 13:33
1
\$\begingroup\$

What about a photodetector and transistor as the receiver - the transmitter could then be a torch which have to shine on a device to switch it on. This is the simplest solution I can think of.

If you are thinking higher tech communications the lowest power and I suspect lightest RF solution might be a the Texas instruments CC430 Microcontroller which has integrated RF. You could of course remove the packaging to reduce weight.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.