0
\$\begingroup\$

I need a 12v 5A power supply for a heating element. I found out there are two main types of smps: first one is mounted in a metallic case and usually cooled by fan (in some websites it is called "industrial smps"), second type is similar to laptop charger without any fan. It seems for long-time usage e. g. weeks or months of supplying power, the actively cooled would be more efficient but I am not sure. On the other hand, since its case is perforated, using it in industrial sites will attract dust and particles in the circuit. And maybe there are other pros and cons which I am not aware. So which one should I use?

\$\endgroup\$

closed as too broad by Marcus Müller, DoxyLover, Edgar Brown, Finbarr, RoyC Feb 17 at 18:02

Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Depends on the environment. How dusty is it? Will moisture ever condensate on it? Please bear (bare?) in mind that fans do fail eventually. \$\endgroup\$ – winny Feb 9 at 13:55
  • \$\begingroup\$ It is a humid and fairly dusty place. \$\endgroup\$ – ETeddy Feb 9 at 13:58
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ The main target of my question is to know other advantage or disadvantages of these two different types of smps. \$\endgroup\$ – ETeddy Feb 9 at 14:01
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ In that case buy an enclosed one and an overdimensioned at that to keep it cool and long lived. If you need 20 A, buy a 30 A one. \$\endgroup\$ – winny Feb 9 at 16:39
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ The "industrial SMPS" is intended to be mounted inside some other equipment. The enclosure of the other equipment would take care of keeping the SMPS clean and ventilated. \$\endgroup\$ – Peter Bennett Feb 9 at 17:13
3
\$\begingroup\$

the actively cooled would be more efficient

I disagree, since the actively cooled SMPS needs that extra cooling and the airflow from the fan it could be (and probably is) less efficient than the fully closed SMPS.

The fully closed SMPS does not have this extra cooling. Assuming both SMPSs are well designed the closed SMPS needs to be more efficient as it cannot dissipate as much heat as the SMPS with the fan.

The increased effciency can be achieved by using a better design and/or better components which will very likely make the closed SMPS a little more expensive. However, a fan also costs money so in the end their prices could be quite similar.

As commented, a fan can fail and dust is an issue. Such a cooled supply does need some maintenance every now and then. I make it a habit of blowing out the dust at least once a year for my server which has an actively cooled SMPS.

The closed SMPS will still get warm so you have to give it some "breathing space". In my experience the closed SMPSs from reputable brands are very reliable and do not run very hot. My choice would be the closed SMPS!

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thank you for your thorough answer. I am really confused and curious why they call it "industrial smps"!? \$\endgroup\$ – ETeddy Feb 9 at 14:43
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ "Industrial SMPS" doesn't officially mean anything in my opinion. What it might mean is: not suitable for home use. And that makes sense, these SMPSs aren't suitable for the general public, there are mains live parts which aren't fully shielded. They are intended to be used by people who know what they're doing. \$\endgroup\$ – Bimpelrekkie Feb 9 at 15:46

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.