0
\$\begingroup\$

Assume I have multiple electronic circuits and I need to display them working together. Each of them has a common ground symbol. However, the different grounds of the different circuits are not necessarily connected together.

Here's a simple example:

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

As you can see, these are basically 3 indenpendent circuits. Of course they could be connected to each other via that one ground symbol, but they needn't be. E.g. in my case, it would be totally fine to connect the circiuits like this:

schematic

simulate this circuit

That would not be allowed if the grounds were connected. I then had a short circuit.

I know there are different types of ground symbols used for different purposes. But that's not the case here.

How do I distinguish individual grounds of the same type (e.g. regular ground) in one diagram?

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ I don't think there is a standard method of doing this. I've had one professor put symbols next to the grounds similar to subscripts in mathematical symbols, and I've seen the different types of ground symbol used with an explanation of what they mean (they may have standard meanings but I rarely see them used that way). \$\endgroup\$ – Hearth Feb 10 at 21:09
  • \$\begingroup\$ You have NOT connected the 3 grounds together. To do that, tie the bottom of each battery together. \$\endgroup\$ – analogsystemsrf Feb 10 at 21:16
  • \$\begingroup\$ @analogsystemsrf: I don't want the three grounds to be connected. Why should I do that? All lamps will light up. They don't need a common ground connection. Imagine they were powered by batteries. \$\endgroup\$ – Thomas Weller Feb 10 at 21:20
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @analogsystemsrf I think you've misunderstood what the question is asking. \$\endgroup\$ – Hearth Feb 10 at 21:36
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Ground only defines a reference 0 V point; you can place it wherever is convenient for the analysis or omit it altogether. In your diagrams it can be omitted as it doesn’t affect the operation of the circuits in any way. \$\endgroup\$ – Chu Feb 11 at 0:48
4
\$\begingroup\$

Just don't use any ground symbol, but use labels, callling them GND1, GND2, etc

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ For that matter for simplicity don’t use any labels except the interface, which in this means both lines 1V, 0V or 1V, Rtn1 or V1,Rtn1 or V+,Gnd1 or \$\endgroup\$ – Tony Stewart Sunnyskyguy EE75 Feb 11 at 14:31
1
\$\begingroup\$

You don't need to use any ground symbols if the circuits are not connected to each other or to "Ground". In your circuits, the "Ground" symbol is just saying "I'm calling this point Zero Volts".

If you are testing the design in a simulator, you would probably need a ground symbol to keep the simulator happy - otherwise, for most simple circuits, you don't need it.

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Yes, they are not necessary in this overly simplified example. But you may want to have ground symbols in HiFi amplifiers which have negative voltage. I then want to define a point of 0V (or three of them, if I have three amplifiers) \$\endgroup\$ – Thomas Weller Feb 10 at 22:01
0
\$\begingroup\$

For kids, no gnd symbols are used until it is understood that GND in electronics just means a 0V reference to other local voltages.

To an electrician, “Ground” also means a 0V reference but with AC grid voltages, might also imply “earth bonded” with some low but in practice, never zero Ohms impedance. Also at the same time all voltage sources are never zero Ohms except in theory or ideal models as everything has some nonzero resistance, even any length of wire!

============

Schematics need to consider the standard practices of intended reader using either Corporate, Industry, Academic or global standards such as IEEE, IPC, NEMA, IEC etc.

You must realize that schematics need to communicate sufficient information for the intended purpose and are also called “Logic diagrams” .

It may be logical to simplify a schematic to show the voltage sources are ideal for simple academic purpose or real such as floating grounds, analog grounds, DC power grounds or AC Earth Bonded grounds, or a chassis ground or an RF ground or optically isolated ground , so there are many ground symbols to choose from. There are star or radial distributed grounds, daisy chained grounds and ground planes. Each are not identical so different symbols may be chosen consistent to your intent or specify needs. E.g. to indicate they are floating sources with an insulation voltage limit, or just a floating source with a “DC supply” and “Return” with an indication of polarity like Vdd,Vss or V+,V-.

But as long as you remember Schematics as just simple “Logic Diagrams” for ease of understanding and never reflect the actual “real life” Impedances unless it is critical to performance, then this must also be documented, by a system or higher level drawing to show interconnections. this includes showing decoupling capacitors, and notes on placement.

Even the Schematic Tool used on this site has 3 different Gnd symbols , but in your case, you wish to indicate they are floating, but have no test points labelled for documents.

My suggestion is always design for test ability and readability, so include labels and test pin points.

In your case it just a simple theoretical academic example, so we do not know the target audience and purpose. it may be acceptable to simply show labels V+, V- and an unused ground symbol to indicate it is floating or show none.

For example an IC schematic would never show a ground symbol unless it being used in a test circuit or evaluation reference design, because the IC is floating.

But in real commercial schematics, one may use symbols OR labels or both for AC earth gnd , Analog DC gnd, Digital Gnd RF gnd etc.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.