0
\$\begingroup\$

I built the following circuit in LTSpice and found each mesh currents to be (which also matches the answer sheet provided by my professor):

i1: 9A
i2: 8A
i3: 11A
i4: -6A

However, I am unable to solve each mesh current using Mesh Analysis following the sign conventions.

Here's my approach:

Mesh 1: i1 = 9A
Mesh 2: R1*(i2 - i1) + i4*3 + R2*(i2 - i3) = 0
Supermesh: R2*(i3 - i2) + R3*i4 = 0
Also: i3 - i4 = 17 ===> i3 = 17 + i4

where R1=6ohm; R2=4ohm; R3=2ohm

If I substitute in mesh current from the spice simulation, the supermesh matches where Mesh 2 doesn't. However, I checked many online sites and followed the sign conventions, but I am not able to get it to work, where did I do wrong?

enter image description here

\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

ok, there was an error in the original question, the current dependent voltage source has a gain of "-3*i4", not 3*i4.

After correcting the sign, the formula is solved as expected.

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ How did your LTspice simulation match the prof's answers then when you had the wrong circuit? \$\endgroup\$ – DKNguyen Feb 27 at 0:09
  • \$\begingroup\$ when the circuit matches the original drawing (with wrong 3*i4), the mesh current i2 was something like 43/7. After I put the minus sign fo (-3*i4), the mesh current i2 became 8A, and there was 6V across R1. \$\endgroup\$ – user97662 Feb 27 at 21:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.