0
\$\begingroup\$

I built the following circuit in LTSpice using the default NPN BJT model (beta = 100).

I calculated the Ib to be 115.754uA. This is how I did the calculation:

  1. Equivalent voltage at base is:
    12V * (800/(800+1000+220)) = 4.75V
  2. Equivalent series input resistance = Equivalent Voltage / Equivalent Current:
    4.75 / (12v / 1220ohm) = 482.9V
  3. This turns the input into equivalent circuit like so: Equivalent Circuit
  4. Use KVL to solve Q1 (assuming Vbe is 0.8V):
    4.75 - ib * 482.9 - 0.8 - ie * 330 = 0
    ie = ib + ic and ic = 100 * ib
    ie = ib * 101
    4.75 - 0.8 = ib * (482.9 + 101 * 330)
    ib = 116.82uA
    ic = ib * 100 = 11.68mA
  5. but the simulation shows:
    ib = 1.3mA and ic = 8.65mA

What is wrong with my calculation?

Original Circuit

\$\endgroup\$
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Your calculated Ic of 11.69 mA would put the collector voltage way below the base voltage. Your assumption of linear operation isn't true. \$\endgroup\$ – glen_geek Mar 1 at 23:03
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Your calculations are correct assuming linear operation, but your transistor is saturated. \$\endgroup\$ – StainlessSteelRat Mar 2 at 0:01
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Read this answer electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/367267/… It should help. \$\endgroup\$ – G36 Mar 2 at 6:54
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thank you. When in saturation mode, the Vce,sat of the spice NPN is set to 0.05756V, and the Vbe,sat is 836mV. After using these two values, i am able to solve the circuit. \$\endgroup\$ – user97662 Mar 2 at 12:07
2
\$\begingroup\$

Assuming Active Mode

The Thevenin equivalent of your base divider is:

$$\begin{align*}V_{\text{TH}}&=V_\text{CC}\cdot \frac{R_5}{R_3+R_4+R_5}\approx 4.7525\:\text{V}\\\\R_{\text{TH}}&=R_5\cdot\frac{R_3+R_4}{R_3+R_4+R_5}\approx 483.17\:\Omega\end{align*}$$

If you assume that the BJT is in active mode (not saturated) then you come up with the approximate value for the base current this way:

$$\begin{align*}I_\text{B}&=\frac{V_{\text{TH}}-V_\text{BE}}{R_{\text{TH}}+\left(\beta+1\right)\cdot R_2}\approx 120\:\mu\text{A}\end{align*}$$

From this, you and work out that the expected voltage drop across the collector resistor would be in excess of \$\beta\cdot R_3\cdot 120\:\mu\text{A}\approx 12 \:\text{V}\$. This, alone, tells you that the circuit is saturated.

So the assumption for active mode is wrong.

Saturated Mode Conclusion

The new circuit, now that you know it is saturated, looks more like this. Using \$V_\text{SAT}=100\:\text{mV}\$ and \$V_\text{BE}=700\:\text{mV}\$, for example, it's:

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

(Note that in saturated mode, the collector looks more like a voltage source and not like a current source [as it does when in active mode.])

At this point, use nodal analysis to solve:

$$\begin{align*} \frac{V_\text{B}}{R_\text{TH}}+I_{V_\text{BE}}&=\frac{V_\text{TH}}{R_\text{TH}}\\\\ \frac{V_\text{C}}{R_1}+I_{V_\text{SAT}}&=\frac{V_\text{CC}}{R_1}\\\\ \frac{V_\text{E}}{R_2}&=I_{V_\text{BE}}+I_{V_\text{SAT}}\\\\ V_\text{B}&=V_\text{E}+V_\text{BE}\\\\ V_\text{C}&=V_\text{E}+V_\text{SAT}\\\\ &\therefore\\\\ V_\text{E}&\approx 3.326\:\text{V}\\\\ V_\text{B}&\approx 4.026\:\text{V}\\\\ V_\text{C}&\approx 3.426\:\text{V}\\\\ \mid\, I_\text{B}\mid=I_{V_\text{BE}}&\approx 1.504\:\text{mA}\\\\ \mid\, I_\text{C}\mid=I_{V_\text{SAT}}&\approx 8.574\:\text{mA}\\\\ \mid\, I_\text{E}\mid=I_{R_2}= \frac{V_\text{E}}{R_2}&\approx 10.078\:\text{mA} \end{align*}$$

That's the complete analysis for the circuit.

Summary

For small signal BJTs, \$V_\text{BE}=700\:\text{mV}\$ when \$I_\text{C}\approx 1.5-2.0\:\text{mA}\$. Clearly, this collector current is more than that range. So I'd expect about \$26\:\text{mV}\cdot\operatorname{ln}\left(\frac{8.574\:\text{mA}}{1.5\:\text{mA}}\right)\approx 45\:\text{mV}\$ higher, or \$V_\text{BE}\approx 745\:\text{mV}\$. You could go back through the process and come up with a refined quantitative calculation. But the above analysis is already close enough and BJTs vary, anyway. So there's no real need to do more.

(Also note that you are using a default BJT in Spice and I'm using more practical estimates for typical small-signal BJTs.)

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.