# Trying to have NMOSs in parallel while passing current through only one at a time

If I wanted to have a bias current I1 going through M1 or M2 and I want M1 to alternate between on off (M1 on/M2 off, M1 off/M2 on) would this work? I simulated this with spice and for the first cycle the nmoss have the bias current through one and none through the other but after the first cycle of the square wave they both have less than the bias current but not zero. What would I be doing wrong? And what configuration would I need to achieve the effect I am looking for? (Clocks go 0V-1.8V) simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

• Because R3 and R4 are giving negative feedback which isn't letting M1 and M2 turn all the way on. It's operating as a linear device, not a switch. The more M1 or M2 turn on, the more current flows through R3, which increases the voltage at the source pin, which (because you are driving the gate with a voltage referenced to ground) decreases the difference in voltage between the gate and source pin which turns the MOSFET off more. An equilibrium is found. Negative feedback – DKNguyen Mar 5 '19 at 3:40
• Swap positions of R3 with M1 and R4 with M2 so that the source pin is the same as ground so negative feedback does not happen. If this is not acceptable then use a floating gate drive so the gate voltage is referenced to the source pin voltage instead of ground, or use a PMOSFET. Using a PMOSFET in between the resistors in each leg will result in the same negative feedback situtation you have now, except R1 and R2 will be the negative feedback resistors so you will have to swap those positions as well as change the gate drive accordingly. – DKNguyen Mar 5 '19 at 3:48
• Per datasheet, IRF530 has a threshold voltage of between 2 and 4 V. You'll need more than a 1.8 V clock to drive those gates. – The Photon Mar 5 '19 at 4:06
• @Toor Make that an answer, let it be marked as such for future searches. – a concerned citizen Mar 5 '19 at 8:01
• I tried your model in LTspice. Despite several errors, warnings and ignored parameters in the model it worked. Maximum 'off' current was 784fA. Only thing of note was I had to set the square wave rise and fall times to >=3us to avoid output spikes. So both the circuit and model appear to be OK (at least in LTspice). – Bruce Abbott Mar 6 '19 at 1:43