I am trying to understand why there are different speed on different frequency bands. I see that e.g. ZigBee can do 250kb/s for both 2.4GHz and 868/915MHz, but WiFi are also 2.4GHz with much larger speeds, why are they different? How come 2.4GHz is so slow for ZigBee and so fast for WiFi when they operate in the same frequency band?

And is it possible to obtain larger speeds on lower frequency bands just by modulating the signal the same as WiFi does? Is modulation impaired by lower frequencies or is it only dependent on how good the modulating hardware is?

Thank you very much in advance!


1 Answer 1


The maximum useful datarate is a fraction of the carrier frequency. However, the difference between ZigBee and WiFi has nothing to do with that. 2.4 GHz is so high, that it is not even close to the limiting factor for data rate.

Generally, there are two tradeoffs with higher data rate over the same frequency carrier: RF bandwidth and power.

A perfect sine wave, like a unmodulated carrier, has a bandwidth of zero. As soon as you start messing with that, the bandwidth becomes non-zero. All modulation schemes by definition must modulate the carrier in some way, so all cause the bandwidth of the transmitted signal to be non-zero. This means that signal will use up some finite amount of the RF spectrum. There are legal and practical reasons why you want to keep the amount of RF spectrum space to a minimum. Different modulation schemes have different characteristics, but one way or the other you're going to pay for high data rate with a high spectrum width, or bandwidth.

The other issue is power. This is the main reason ZigBee is much lower data rate than WiFi. I won't go into all the reasons why since it seems off topic to the question and the answer could be a whole book, but it takes more power to transmit a higher data rate at the same signal to noise ratio as a lower one. In some sense, you can trade off data rate with signal to noise ratio at the same power. There are also power and dollar costs in the electronics that have to handle the higher data rate independent of the RF power. Since ZigBee is intended for small low power battery operated devices, a tradeoff was made between data rate, power requirements, distance, and usefulness. Because battery operation was so important, the data rate was made lower. WiFi, on the other hand, had little constraint on the power required for the electronics. Its intended use also demands higher data rate, so a different tradeoff was made.

  • \$\begingroup\$ +1 - nice answer, thought I'd mention there are also practical reasons why you may sometimes want to widen the bandwidth (e.g. spread spectrum) \$\endgroup\$
    – Oli Glaser
    Oct 7, 2012 at 22:30
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Olin Actual numbers comparing bandwidth and rf power for wifi vs zigbee would be useful and would support the claims made. \$\endgroup\$ Oct 8, 2012 at 1:59
  • \$\begingroup\$ Great answer, thank you. But when talking about the tradeoff between speed and spectrum width, could you provide a small example? Thank you \$\endgroup\$
    – chwi
    Oct 8, 2012 at 5:00
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Wilhelmsen: Look up the frequency analysis of AM modulation. Briefly, the spectrum of a AM transmission is the carrier with the modulated signal on either side of it. A 1 kHz signal on a 1 MHz carrier therefore has frequencies at 999 kHz, 1.000 MHz, and 1.001 MHz. The spread would be wider with a higher modulation frequency. That is just one simplified example. There is a lot written about that out there. \$\endgroup\$ Oct 8, 2012 at 12:13
  • \$\begingroup\$ Simplified or not, it was exactly what I wanted so thank you very much! Excellent! \$\endgroup\$
    – chwi
    Oct 8, 2012 at 17:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.